Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36543841›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2022

Safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Angela Yun Kim, Anna Marduy, Paulo S de Melo, Anna Carolyna Gianlorenco, Chi Kyung Kim, Hyuk Choi, Jae-Jun Song, Felipe Fregni

10 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 10 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 126 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06193317 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects of taVNS on Fibromyalgia Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorSpaulding Rehabilitation HospitalRan2026 to 2029Enrolled152ConditionsFibromyalgia, PainArmsTransauricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS)
NCT06294509 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Timings in a Sensorimotor Task

TypeinterventionalSponsorOlivier LambercyRan2024 to 2025Enrolled75ConditionsHealthyArmsin-house developed transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation device
NCT06723743 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Effects on Attention and Working Memory: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaylor College of MedicineRan2026 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsTraumatic Brain Injury (TBI) PatientsArmsTranscutaneous vagus nerve stimulation for attention in veterans with TBI, Soterix Medical Vagus Nerve Stimulation mini-CT
NCT06821893 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Vagus Auricular Stimulation for Tinnitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2025 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsTinnitusArmsVibrational stimulation, Sham
NCT06957912 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Quality of Recovery After Major Noncardiac Surgery: A Randomized Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled320ConditionsVagus Nerve Stimulation, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Noncardiac Surgery, Quality of RecoveryArmsTranscutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation, Sham stimulation
NCT07093034 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Sustained Auricular Nerve Stimulation for PVC Suppression

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2025 to 2026Enrolled16ConditionsPremature Ventricular Complexes, PVC - Premature Ventricular Contraction, Auricular Vagus Nerve StimulationArmsExtended nocturnal use of auricular vagus nerve stimulator device
NCT07371676 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Acute Effects of Post-Exercise Vagus Nerve Stimulation on the Autonomic Nervous System and Recovery in Healthy Young Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul Gelisim UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsAuricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation, Transcutaneous, RecoveryArmsStimulation
NCT07411846 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Perceived Stress and Psychological Distress in University Students With High Distress Levels: A Randomized Blinded Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorEgas Moniz - Cooperativa de Ensino Superior, CRLRan2025 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsPsychological Distress, Stress (Psychology), Perceived StressArmstaVNS, Sham
NCT07482930 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Acute Effects Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Spirometric Parameters in Healthy Individuals: A Sham-Controlled Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSEFA HAKTAN HATIKRan2026 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsVagus Nerve Stimulations, Spirometry, Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) Functioning and Mood State, Blood Pressure MonitoringArmsTranscutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation, Sham transcutaneous auricular stimulation
NCT07498881 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

LasaiOn: An Intervention Program to Reduce Emotional Distress

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)Ran2026 to 2028Enrolled200ConditionsAdultArmsLasaiON
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Angela Yun Kim *Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Anna Marduy *Uniao Metropolitana de Ensino e Cultura (UNIME) Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Paulo S de Melo *Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 96 13th Street, Charlestown, Boston, MA, USA.
Anna Carolyna GianlorencoNeuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 96 13th Street, Charlestown, Boston, MA, USA.
Chi Kyung KimDepartment of Neurology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyuk ChoiDepartment of Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Jun SongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Felipe FregniNeuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 96 13th Street, Charlestown, Boston, MA, USA. Fregni.Felipe@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been investigated as a novel neuromodulation tool. Although taVNS is generally considered safe with only mild and transient adverse effects (AEs), those specifically caused by taVNS have not yet been investigated. This systematic review and meta-analysis on taVNS aimed to (1) systematically analyze study characteristics and AE assessment, (2) characterize and analyze possible AEs and their incidence, (3) search for predictable risk factors, (4) analyze the severity of AE, and (5) suggest an evidence-based taVNS adverse events questionnaire for safety monitoring. The articles searched were published through April 7, 2022, in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Lilacs databases. In general, we evaluated 177 studies that assessed 6322 subjects. From these, 55.37% of studies did not mention the presence or absence of any AEs; only 24.86% of the studies described that at least one adverse event occurred. In the 35 studies reporting the number of subjects with at least one adverse event, a meta-analytic approach to calculate the risk differences of developing an adverse event between active taVNS and controls was used. The meta-analytic overall adverse events incidence rate was calculated for the total number of adverse events reported on a 100,000 person-minutes-days scale. There were no differences in risk of developing an adverse event between active taVNS and controls. The incidence of AE, in general, was 12.84/100,000 person-minutes-days of stimulation, and the most frequently reported were ear pain, headache, and tingling. Almost half of the studies did not report the presence or absence of any AEs. We attribute this to the absence of AE in those studies. There was no causal relationship between taVNS and severe adverse events. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of transcutaneous auricular stimulation safety. Overall, taVNS is a safe and feasible option for clinical intervention.

Indexed as

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationVagus Nerve StimulationHeadacheHumansPain ManagementVagus Nerve

Identifiers

PMID36543841
PMCPMC9772204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 4 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.