Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36543834›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Machine learning-assisted system using digital facial images to predict the clinical activity score in thyroid-associated orbitopathy.

Jae Hoon Moon, Kyubo Shin, Gyeong Min Lee, Jaemin Park, Min Joung Lee, Hokyung Choung, Namju Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jae Hoon Moon *Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Kyubo Shin *THYROSCOPE INC., Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Gyeong Min LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Jaemin ParkTHYROSCOPE INC., Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Min Joung LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital and Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Hokyung ChoungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center and Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Namju KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Republic of Korea. resourceful@hanmail.net.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRHallym University Sacred Heart Hospital · KRSNUH SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the clinical activity score (CAS) is a validated scoring system for identifying disease activity of thyroid-associated orbitopathy (TAO), it may produce differing results depending on the evaluator, and an experienced ophthalmologist is required for accurate evaluation. In this study, we developed a machine learning (ML)-assisted system to mimic an expert's CAS assessment using digital facial images and evaluated its accuracy for predicting the CAS and diagnosing active TAO (CAS ≥ 3). An ML-assisted system was designed to assess five CAS components related to inflammatory signs (redness of the eyelids, redness of the conjunctiva, swelling of the eyelids, inflammation of the caruncle and/or plica, and conjunctival edema) in patients' facial images and to predict the CAS by considering two components of subjective symptoms (spontaneous retrobulbar pain and pain on gaze). To train and test the system, 3,060 cropped images from 1020 digital facial images of TAO patients were used. The reference CAS for each image was scored by three ophthalmologists, each with > 15 years of clinical experience. We repeated the experiments for 30 randomly split training and test sets at a ratio of 8:2. The sensitivity and specificity of the ML-assisted system for diagnosing active TAO were 72.7% and 83.2% in the test set constructed from the entire dataset. For the test set constructed from the dataset with consistent results for the three ophthalmologists, the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing active TAO were 88.1% and 86.9%. In the test sets from the entire dataset and from the dataset with consistent results, 40.0% and 49.9% of the predicted CAS values were the same as the reference CAS, respectively. The system predicted the CAS within 1 point of the reference CAS in 84.6% and 89.0% of cases when tested using the entire dataset and in the dataset with consistent results, respectively. An ML-assisted system estimated the clinical activity of TAO and detect inflammatory active TAO with reasonable accuracy. The accuracy could be improved further by obtaining more data. This ML-assisted system can help evaluate the disease activity consistently as well as accurately and enable the early diagnosis and timely treatment of active TAO.

Indexed as

ExophthalmosGraves OphthalmopathyHumansOrbitSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID36543834
PMCPMC9772205
OpenAlexW4312045878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.