Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36543806›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2022

ChAdOx1 NiV vaccination protects against lethal Nipah Bangladesh virus infection in African green monkeys.

Neeltje van Doremalen, Victoria A Avanzato, Kerry Goldin, Friederike Feldmann, Jonathan E Schulz, Elaine Haddock, Atsushi Okumura, Jamie Lovaglio, Patrick W Hanley, Kathleen Cordova and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Neeltje van DoremalenLaboratory of Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4368-6359
Victoria A AvanzatoLaboratory of Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, USA.
Kerry GoldinLaboratory of Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, USA.
Friederike FeldmannRocky Mountain Veterinary Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1363-1077
Jonathan E SchulzLaboratory of Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, USA.
Elaine HaddockLaboratory of Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8260-227X
Atsushi OkumuraLaboratory of Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, USA.
Jamie LovaglioRocky Mountain Veterinary Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7567-446X
Patrick W HanleyRocky Mountain Veterinary Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, USA.
Kathleen CordovaRocky Mountain Veterinary Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, USA.
Greg SaturdayRocky Mountain Veterinary Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0803-6177
Emmie de WitLaboratory of Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9763-7758
Teresa LambeOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sarah C GilbertChinese Academy of Medical Science (CAMS) Oxford Institute (COI), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6823-9750
Vincent J MunsterLaboratory of Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT, USA. vincent.munster@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2288-3196
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Virus Ecology UnitZIAAI001179 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI MUNSTER, VINCENT · 2013 to 2025
$24.3M
Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM142617 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Jason Yustein · 2022 to 2026
$7.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AI001179NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM142617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nipah virus (NiV) is a highly pathogenic and re-emerging virus, which causes sporadic but severe infections in humans. Currently, no vaccines against NiV have been approved. We previously showed that ChAdOx1 NiV provides full protection against a lethal challenge with NiV Bangladesh (NiV-B) in hamsters. Here, we investigated the efficacy of ChAdOx1 NiV in the lethal African green monkey (AGM) NiV challenge model. AGMs were vaccinated either 4 weeks before challenge (prime vaccination), or 8 and 4 weeks before challenge with ChAdOx1 NiV (prime-boost vaccination). A robust humoral and cellular response was detected starting 14 days post-initial vaccination. Upon challenge, control animals displayed a variety of signs and had to be euthanized between 5 and 7 days post inoculation. In contrast, vaccinated animals showed no signs of disease, and we were unable to detect infectious virus in tissues and all but one swab. No to limited antibodies against fusion protein or nucleoprotein antigen could be detected 42 days post challenge, suggesting that vaccination induced a very robust protective immune response preventing extensive virus replication.

Identifiers

PMID36543806
PMCPMC9768398
OpenAlexW4312112841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.