Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36543699›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of preventive medicine2023

Community Health Workers to Increase Cancer Screening: 3 Community Guide Systematic Reviews.

Devon L Okasako-Schmucker, Yinan Peng, Jamaicia Cobb, Leigh R Buchanan, Ka Zang Xiong, Shawna L Mercer, Susan A Sabatino, Stephanie Melillo, Patrick L Remington, Shiriki K Kumanyika and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of preventive medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Acceptability of Stool-Based DNA Colorectal Cancer Screening among Black/African-American Patients Served by Federally Qualified Health Centers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Effectiveness ofCancers · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Devon L Okasako-SchmuckerCommunity Guide Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy (OADPS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Yinan PengCommunity Guide Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy (OADPS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: ypeng@cdc.gov.
Jamaicia CobbCommunity Guide Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy (OADPS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Leigh R BuchananCherokee Nation Operational Solutions, Arlington, Virginia.
Ka Zang XiongCommunity Guide Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy (OADPS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Shawna L MercerCommunity Guide Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy (OADPS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Susan A SabatinoDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta Georgia.
Stephanie MelilloDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta Georgia.
Patrick L RemingtonDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Shiriki K KumanyikaDepartment of Community Health and Prevention, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Beth GlennDepartment of Health Policy & Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Erica S BreslauHealthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Cam EscofferyDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Maria E FernandezDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas.
Gloria D CoronadoKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
Karen GlanzDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Patricia D MullenDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas.
Sally W VernonDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas.
Community Preventive Services Task Force
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USCherokee Nation · USDrexel University · USEmory University · USKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany in the U.S. are not up to date with cancer screening. This systematic review examined the effectiveness of interventions engaging community health workers to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.

methodsAuthors identified relevant publications from previous Community Guide systematic reviews of interventions to increase cancer screening (1966 through 2013) and from an update search (January 2014-November 2021). Studies written in English and published in peer-reviewed journals were included if they assessed interventions implemented in high-income countries; reported screening for breast, cervical, or colorectal cancer; and engaged community health workers to implement part or all of the interventions. Community health workers needed to come from or have close knowledge of the intervention community.

resultsThe review included 76 studies. Interventions engaging community health workers increased screening use for breast (median increase=11.5 percentage points, interquartile interval=5.5‒23.5), cervical (median increase=12.8 percentage points, interquartile interval=6.4‒21.0), and colorectal cancers (median increase=10.5 percentage points, interquartile interval=4.5‒17.5). Interventions were effective whether community health workers worked alone or as part of a team. Interventions increased cancer screening independent of race or ethnicity, income, or insurance status. DISCUSSION: Interventions engaging community health workers are recommended by the Community Preventive Services Task Force to increase cancer screening. These interventions are typically implemented in communities where people are underserved to improve health and can enhance health equity. Further training and financial support for community health workers should be considered to increase cancer screening uptake.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerNeoplasmsCommunity Health WorkersHumansIncomePreventive Health Services

Identifiers

PMID36543699
PMCPMC10033345
OpenAlexW4312054117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.