ArticleResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP2023
Adherence to lipid-lowering therapy and reaching treatment goals in youth seen in a preventive cardiology clinic.
Article in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the Efficacy of a Pre-Established Lipid-Lowering Algorithm in Managing Hypercholesterolemia in Patients at Very High Cardiovascular Risk.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Midterm Follow-Up of Familial Hypercholesterolemia from a Cross-Sectional School-Based Cholesterol Screening Program.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe efficacy of lipid-lowering therapy in reducing cardiovascular disease in adults is well-established. Unfortunately, it is also well-established that adults have inadequate adherence to lipid-lowering therapy, which is associated with increased costs and mortality. However, the adherence patterns of youth prescribed lipid-lowering therapy is not well-described.
methodsWe analyzed data that was prospectively collected from patients <27 years-old who were referred to a large regional preventive cardiology clinic from 2010 to 2017. Adherence to lipid-lowering therapy was self-reported at the patient's most recent clinic visit and categorized as either adequate adherence (≥80%) or inadequate adherence (<80%). We compared adherence rates by demographic factors, class of lipid-lowering therapy, length of time on lipid-lowering therapy, family history, lipid parameters, and laboratory measures of adverse effects.
resultsIn our cohort, we had 318 patients prescribed a lipid-lowering medication over a seven-year period. Of those, 235 (75%) had adequate adherence. Those with adequate adherence had an improved LDL-C (123 mg/dL [standard deviation (SD) 32.3] vs. 167 mg/dL [SD 50.4], p < 0.05), total cholesterol (198 mg/dL [49.5] vs. 239 mg/dL [SD 53.2]), and non-HDL-C (148 mg/dL [SD 38.7] vs. 193 mg/dL [SD 43.9]). In addition, patients with adequate adherence were more likely to reach goal LDL-C of <130 mg/dL than those with inadequate adherence (130 vs. 25, p < 0.01). The relationship between LDL-C and adherence remained statistically significant after controlling for age, gender, and the length of time on therapy (β = -0.66, p < 0.01). Adherence level did not differ by gender, class of lipid-lowering therapy, length of time on lipid-lowering therapy, or presence of a family history of an atherosclerotic event. The findings were similar when we only analyzed those prescribed a statin.
conclusionsSelf-reported adherence to lipid-lowering therapy in youth is excellent and was associated with achieving goal LDL-C goals. Obtaining adherence data from patients may help more patients reach LDL-C goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.