ArticleThe Lancet. Digital health2023
A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: a retrospective model development and validation study.
Article in The Lancet. Digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06762704 (A Non-Invasive Artificial Intelligence Model for the Prediction of Human Blastocyst Ploidy), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Non-Invasive Artificial Intelligence Model for the Prediction of Human Blastocyst Ploidy: a Multi-Center, Prospective, Non-Randomized Validation Study
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.
- "Old and new" frontiers in embryo viability assessment: current practices and introduction of emerging approaches.Biology of reproduction · 2026Review
- ALPS-HCC Score: A Dynamic Liver Stiffness Measurement-Based Machine Learning Model to Predict Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Article
- Technological Advances in Molecular Diagnostic Methods for Hereditary Diseases in Preconception and Prenatal Settings.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- A machine learning-assisted approach to explain key determinants for achieving live birth in autologous ICSI cycles.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- From genes to germ layers: virtual twins of gastruloids.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Review
- The potential, perils and pitfalls of Artificial intelligence (AI) in Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART).Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Review
- Microfluidic automation improves oocyte recovery from follicular fluid of patients undergoing in vitro fertilization.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Pregnancy AI: Development and Internal Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Tool to Predict Live Births in ICSI and IVF Cycles Using Clinical Features and Embryo Images.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Introducing the Blastocyst Fragmentation Indicator (BFI): A Novel Time-Lapse Metric for Enhanced Aneuploidy Risk Stratification in Non-Invasive Embryo Assessment.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Routine IVF Practice.Biology · 2025Review
- Spatial ploidy inference using quantitative imaging.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Euploidy rates within blastocysts obtained from differently sized cohorts and age groups approximate a binomial distribution.F&S reports · 2025Article
- Current progress and open challenges for applying artificial intelligence across thePatterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- [Progress in the application of artificial intelligence in assisted reproduction].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025Review
- Prediction of human embryo ploidy based on morphokinetic parameters: Investigating the use of time-lapse imaging for non-invasive embryo selection.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2025Article
- Risk Assessment and Fertility Counseling for Hereditary Gynecological Cancer Syndromes.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Stem cell-based human embryo models: current knowledge and open questions.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Hybrid Radiomics and Machine Learning for Brain Tumors Multi-Task Classification: An Exploratory Study on Integrating GLCM and Curvelet-Based Features for Enhanced Accuracy.Health science reports · 2025Article
- A foundational model for in vitro fertilization trained on 18 million time-lapse images.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOne challenge in the field of in-vitro fertilisation is the selection of the most viable embryos for transfer. Morphological quality assessment and morphokinetic analysis both have the disadvantage of intra-observer and inter-observer variability. A third method, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), has limitations too, including its invasiveness and cost. We hypothesised that differences in aneuploid and euploid embryos that allow for model-based classification are reflected in morphology, morphokinetics, and associated clinical information.
methodsIn this retrospective study, we used machine-learning and deep-learning approaches to develop STORK-A, a non-invasive and automated method of embryo evaluation that uses artificial intelligence to predict embryo ploidy status. Our method used a dataset of 10 378 embryos that consisted of static images captured at 110 h after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, morphokinetic parameters, blastocyst morphological assessments, maternal age, and ploidy status. Independent and external datasets, Weill Cornell Medicine EmbryoScope+ (WCM-ES+; Weill Cornell Medicine Center of Reproductive Medicine, NY, USA) and IVI Valencia (IVI Valencia, Health Research Institute la Fe, Valencia, Spain) were used to test the generalisability of STORK-A and were compared measuring accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
findingsAnalysis and model development included the use of 10 378 embryos, all with PGT-A results, from 1385 patients (maternal age range 21-48 years; mean age 36·98 years [SD 4·62]). STORK-A predicted aneuploid versus euploid embryos with an accuracy of 69·3% (95% CI 66·9-71·5; AUC 0·761; positive predictive value [PPV] 76·1%; negative predictive value [NPV] 62·1%) when using images, maternal age, morphokinetics, and blastocyst score. A second classification task trained to predict complex aneuploidy versus euploidy and single aneuploidy produced an accuracy of 74·0% (95% CI 71·7-76·1; AUC 0·760; PPV 54·9%; NPV 87·6%) using an image, maternal age, morphokinetic parameters, and blastocyst grade. A third classification task trained to predict complex aneuploidy versus euploidy had an accuracy of 77·6% (95% CI 75·0-80·0; AUC 0·847; PPV 76·7%; NPV 78·0%). STORK-A reported accuracies of 63·4% (AUC 0·702) on the WCM-ES+ dataset and 65·7% (AUC 0·715) on the IVI Valencia dataset, when using an image, maternal age, and morphokinetic parameters, similar to the STORK-A test dataset accuracy of 67·8% (AUC 0·737), showing generalisability.
interpretationAs a proof of concept, STORK-A shows an ability to predict embryo ploidy in a non-invasive manner and shows future potential as a standardised supplementation to traditional methods of embryo selection and prioritisation for implantation or recommendation for PGT-A.
fundingUS National Institutes of Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.