Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36543351›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2022

Everything causes cancer? Beliefs and attitudes towards cancer prevention among anti-vaxxers, flat earthers, and reptilian conspiracists: online cross sectional survey.

Sonia Paytubi, Yolanda Benavente, Alexandra Montoliu, Gemma Binefa, Maria Brotons, Raquel Ibáñez, Cristian Ochoa, Paula Peremiquel-Trillas, Beatriz Serrano, Noémie Travier and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tracking Workplace Violence over 20 Years.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Health Scares: Tracing Their Nature, Growth and Spread.Clinical psychology in Europe · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2023
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonia PaytubiCancer Epidemiology Research Programme, IDIBELL, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Yolanda BenaventeCancer Epidemiology Research Programme, IDIBELL, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Alexandra MontoliuCancer Epidemiology Research Programme, IDIBELL, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Gemma BinefaConsortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Maria BrotonsCancer Epidemiology Research Programme, IDIBELL, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Raquel IbáñezCancer Epidemiology Research Programme, IDIBELL, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristian OchoaeHealth ICOnnecta't and Psycho-oncology Services, IDIBELL, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Paula Peremiquel-TrillasCancer Epidemiology Research Programme, IDIBELL, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Beatriz SerranoCancer Epidemiology Research Programme, IDIBELL, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Noémie TravierCancer Prevention and Control Program, IDIBELL, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Laia AlemanyCancer Epidemiology Research Programme, IDIBELL, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura CostasCancer Epidemiology Research Programme, IDIBELL, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain lcostas@iconcologia.net.ORCID 0000-0003-2755-302X
Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate, using an online non-probability sample, the beliefs about and attitudes towards cancer prevention of people professing vaccination scepticism or conspiracy theories.

designCross sectional survey.

settingData collected mainly from ForoCoches (a well known Spanish forum) and other platforms, including Reddit (English), 4Chan (English), HispaChan (Spanish), and a Spanish language website for cancer prevention (mejorsincancer.org) from January to March 2022.

participantsAmong 1494 responders, 209 were unvaccinated against covid-19, 112 preferred alternative rather than conventional medicine, and 62 reported flat earth or reptilian beliefs.

main outcome measuresCancer beliefs assessed using the Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM) and Cancer Awareness Measure Mythical Causes Scale (CAM-MYCS) (both validated tools).

resultsAwareness of the actual causes of cancer was greater (median CAM score 63.6%) than that of mythical causes (41.7%). The most endorsed mythical causes of cancer were eating food containing additives or sweeteners, feeling stressed, and eating genetically modified food. Awareness of the actual and mythical causes of cancer among the unvaccinated, alternative medicine, and conspiracy groups was lower than among their counterparts. A median of 54.5% of the actual causes was accurately identified among each of the unvaccinated, alternative medicine, and conspiracy groups, and a median of 63.6% was identified in each of the three corresponding counterparts (P=0.13, 0.04, and 0.003, respectively). For mythical causes, medians of 25.0%, 16.7%, and 16.7% were accurately identified in the unvaccinated, alternative medicine, and conspiracy groups, respectively; a median of 41.7% was identified in each of the three corresponding counterparts (P<0.001 in adjusted models for all comparisons). In total, 673 (45.0%) participants agreed with the statement "It seems like everything causes cancer." No significant differences were observed among the unvaccinated (44.0%), conspiracist (41.9%), or alternative medicine groups (35.7%), compared with their counterparts (45.2%, 45.7%, and 45.8%, respectively).

conclusionsAlmost half of the participants agreed that "It seems like everything causes cancer," which highlights the difficulty that society encounters in differentiating actual and mythical causes owing to mass information. People who believed in conspiracies, rejected the covid-19 vaccine, or preferred alternative medicine were more likely to endorse the mythical causes of cancer than their counterparts but were less likely to endorse the actual causes of cancer. These results suggest a direct connection between digital misinformation and consequent erroneous health decisions, which may represent a further preventable fraction of cancer.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsCausalityCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36543351
PMCPMC9768817
OpenAlexW4312191235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.