Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36543256›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics2022

Impact of pharmacist-initiated educational interventions on improving medication reconciliation practice in geriatric inpatients during hospital admission in Vietnam.

Phuong Thi Xuan Dong, Van Thi Thuy Pham, Linh Thi Nguyen, Anh Van Le, Thao Thi Nguyen, Hoa Dinh Vu, Huong Thi Lien Nguyen, Hoa Thi Nguyen, Susan Hua, Shu Chuen Li

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and safety of S-ketamine in pain management for breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Phuong Thi Xuan DongDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Hanoi University of Pharmacy, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-4247
Van Thi Thuy PhamDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Hanoi University of Pharmacy, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Linh Thi NguyenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Hanoi University of Pharmacy, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Anh Van LeDepartment of Pharmacy, Friendship Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Thao Thi NguyenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Hanoi University of Pharmacy, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Hoa Dinh VuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Hanoi University of Pharmacy, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Huong Thi Lien NguyenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Hanoi University of Pharmacy, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Hoa Thi NguyenDepartment of Musculoskeletal System, Friendship Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Susan HuaSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Shu Chuen LiSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3329-3095
Hanoi University of Pharmacy · VNUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND

objectiveUnintentional medication discrepancies (UMDs) are common in geriatric patients during care transitions, resulting in frequent undesirable consequences. Medication reconciliation could be a useful practice to prevent or ameliorate UMD. However, this practice in Vietnamese hospitals has not been well established or standardized. This study aims to determine the effect of pharmacist-initiated educational interventions on improving medication reconciliation practice.

methodsThis prospective 6-month pre-and post-study was conducted in two internal medicine wards in a Vietnamese 800-bed public hospital. Pharmacists provided training and short-term support to physicians on medication reconciliation. Primary outcome measures were the proportions of patients with at least one UMD at admission. Secondary outcome measures were the proportions of patients with preventable adverse drug events (pADEs) score ≥0.1 due to these UMDs. Odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were assessed based on a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: One hundred fifty-two patients were recruited in the pre-intervention phase, and 146 in the post-intervention phase. Following the intervention, the proportion of geriatric patients with ≥1 UMD at admission significantly decreased from 55.3 to 25.3 % (ORadj 0.255, 95% CI: 0.151-0.431). Similarly, the proportion of patients with a pADE ≥0.1 at admission reduced from 44.1 to 11.6% [ORadj 0.188, 95% CI: 0.105-0.340] post-intervention. WHAT IS NEW AND

conclusionOur pharmacist-initiated educational interventions have demonstrated the ability to produce substantial improvement in medication reconciliation practice, reducing UMDs and potential harm. Our approach may provide an alternate option to implement medication reconciliation for jurisdictions with limited healthcare resources.

Indexed as

Medication ReconciliationPharmacy Service, HospitalAgedHospitalsHumansInpatientsMedication ErrorsPatient AdmissionPharmacistsProspective StudiesVietnamgeriatricmedication reconciliationpharmacist

Identifiers

PMID36543256
PMCPMC10086993
OpenAlexW4292313490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.