Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36542918›Full record

ArticleHealth & place2023

'Loob' and 'labas': Spatial constructions of safety and risk amid the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines.

Gideon Lasco, Michael L Tan, Vincen Gregory Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & place, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gideon LascoDepartment of Anthropology, University of the Philippines Diliman, Philippines; Development Studies Program, Ateneo de Manila University, Philippines.
Michael L TanDepartment of Anthropology, University of the Philippines Diliman, Philippines.
Vincen Gregory YuDevelopment Studies Program, Ateneo de Manila University, Philippines; Social Medicine Unit, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Philippines. Electronic address: vyu@ateneo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article argues that local constructions of risky and safe spaces, as articulated by the notions 'loob' (inside) and 'labas' (outside), informed popular and political responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines, leading to an overemphasis on staying at home and, conversely, a general avoidance or fear of outdoor spaces that was at times reinforced by public health authorities. Practices and policies related to the pandemic response rendered this binary opposition between 'loob' and 'labas' visible, from regulations concerning the use of personal protective equipment to restrictions of access to outdoor spaces. While this emergent form of bodily proxemics was contested and negotiated over time, its tenacity throughout the pandemic underscores the importance of understanding how people spatialize risk in times of health crises.

Indexed as

COVID-19FearHumansPandemicsPhilippinesPublic HealthConceptualization of riskCOVID-19 pandemicIndoor spacesOutdoor spacesPhilippinesProxemics

Identifiers

PMID36542918
PMCPMC9676171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.