Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36542647›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Impact of early detection on cancer curability: A modified Delphi panel study.

Lee Schwartzberg, Michael S Broder, Sikander Ailawadhi, Himisha Beltran, L Johnetta Blakely, G Thomas Budd, Laurie Carr, Michael Cecchini, Patrick Cobb, Anuraag Kansal and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prevalence of chemical restraint use in hospital care: a consensus and cross-sectional study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  2. Modeling the Impact of Multicancer Early Detection Tests: A Review of Natural History of Disease Models.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025
    Review
  3. Potential for Cure by Stage across the Cancer Spectrum in the United States.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lee SchwartzbergDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Renown Institute for Cancer, Reno, Nevada, United States of America.
Michael S BroderPartnership for Health Analytic Research (PHAR), LLC, Beverly Hills, California, United States of America.
Sikander AilawadhiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America.
Himisha BeltranDepartment of Medical Oncology, Divisions of Genitourinary Oncology and Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
L Johnetta BlakelyHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6075-4937
G Thomas BuddDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
Laurie CarrDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Michael CecchiniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Patrick CobbOncology Research, Intermountain Healthcare, Billings, Montana, United States of America.
Anuraag KansalHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina Inc., currently held separate from Illumina Inc. under the terms of the Interim Measures Order of the European Commission dated 29 October 2021, Menlo Park, California, United States of America.
Ashley KimHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina Inc., currently held separate from Illumina Inc. under the terms of the Interim Measures Order of the European Commission dated 29 October 2021, Menlo Park, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0579-2348
Bradley J MonkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona, Creighton University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Deborah J WongDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Cynthia CamposPartnership for Health Analytic Research (PHAR), LLC, Beverly Hills, California, United States of America.
Irina YermilovPartnership for Health Analytic Research (PHAR), LLC, Beverly Hills, California, United States of America.

Funding

Immunomodulatory Effects of Targeting DNA Repair with Novel Temozolomide Combinations in Colorectal CancerK08CA255465 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CECCHINI, MICHAEL · 2021 to 2025
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA255465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expert consensus on the potential benefits of early cancer detection does not exist for most cancer types. We convened 10 practicing oncologists using a RAND/UCLA modified Delphi panel to evaluate which of 20 solid tumors, representing >40 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)-identified cancer types and 80% of total cancer incidence, would receive potential clinical benefits from early detection. Pre-meeting, experts estimated how long cancers take to progress and rated the current curability and benefit (improvement in curability) of an annual hypothetical multi-cancer screening blood test. Post-meeting, experts rerated all questions. Cancers had varying estimates of the potential benefit of early cancer detection depending on estimates of their curability and progression by stage. Cancers rated as progressing quickly and being curable in earlier stages (stomach, esophagus, lung, urothelial tract, melanoma, ovary, sarcoma, bladder, cervix, breast, colon/rectum, kidney, uterus, anus, head and neck) were estimated to be most likely to benefit from a hypothetical screening blood test. Cancer types rated as progressing quickly but having comparatively lower cure rates in earlier stages (liver/intrahepatic bile duct, gallbladder, pancreas) were estimated to have medium likelihood of benefit from a hypothetical screening blood test. Cancer types rated as progressing more slowly and having higher curability regardless of stage (prostate, thyroid) were estimated to have limited likelihood of benefit from a hypothetical screening blood test. The panel concluded most solid tumors have a likelihood of benefit from early detection. Even among difficult-to-treat cancers (e.g., pancreas, liver/intrahepatic bile duct, gallbladder), early-stage detection was believed to be beneficial. Based on the panel consensus, broad coverage of cancers by screening blood tests would deliver the greatest potential benefits to patients.

Indexed as

MelanomaNeoplasmsSarcomaBreastConsensus Statements as TopicEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMass Screening

Identifiers

PMID36542647
PMCPMC9770338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.