ArticlePloS one2022
Quantitative analysis of Weibel-Palade bodies.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- RAB5C Increases Endothelial Release of VWF by Regulating Vesicle Trafficking.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026Article
- Clusterin knockdown has effects on intracellular and secreted von Willebrand factor in human umbilical vein endothelial cells.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Weibel Palade bodies (WPBs) are vesicles found in endothelial cells which carry the multimeric protein von Willebrand factor (VWF). As cellular confluency has been shown to influence the number of WPBs in endothelial cells, we propose to test two methods of attaining endothelial cell confluence to inform on the relevancy of cellular culture methods when analyzing endothelial WPBs. We test these cellular culture methods in two endothelial cell types, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs). One method maintains a constant incubation time of 96 hrs. while varying the seeding density. The second method maintains a constant seeding density of 30,000 cells/cm2 while varying incubation time. In comparing these two methods, we evaluate the nuclei count, total WPB count, and WPB/nuclei count for each. Our results show that there is a trend of increasing nuclei count, total WPB count, and WPB/nuclei count as incubation time and seeding density increases. However, there is no difference in WPB/nuclei quantification whether confluency is reached via a constant seeding density or a constant incubation time. In addition, we show that confluency plays a major role in WPB/nuclei generation as we demonstrate higher WPB/nuclei counts in confluent cultures compared to sub-confluent cultures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.