Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36542592›Full record

ArticleRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina)2022

[Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis of organic involvement of amyloidosis: Part 3/3 Year 2020]

Maria Lourdes Posadas Martinez, María Adela Aguirre, Gustavo Greloni, Sebastian Marciano, Diego Perez de Arenaza, Marcelo Rugiero, Mauricio Tomei, Veronica Peuchot, Elsa Nucifora, Lucas Sebastián Aparicio and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Lourdes Posadas MartinezServicio de Clínica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. posadas.lourdes@gmail.com.
María Adela AguirreServicio de Clínica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. adela.aguirre@hospitalitaliano.org.ar.
Gustavo GreloniSección de Nefrología, Servicio de Clínica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina. gustavo.greloni@hospitalitaliano.org.ar.
Sebastian MarcianoSección de Hepatología, Servicio de Clinica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos AIres, Argentina. sebastian.marciano@hospitalitaliano.org.ar.
Diego Perez de ArenazaServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina. diego.perezdearenasa@hospitalitaliano.org.ar.
Marcelo RugieroDepartamento de Neurología, Servicio de Clinica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. marcelo.rugiero@hospitalitaliano.org.ar.
Mauricio TomeiClinica Giuliani Charata, Chaco, Argentina. mht10@hotmail.com.
Veronica PeuchotServicio de Clínica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. veronica.peuchot@hospitalitaliano.org.ar.
Elsa NuciforaSección de Hematologia, Servicio de Clinica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos AIres, Argentina. elsa.nucifora@hospitalitaliano.org.ar.
Lucas Sebastián AparicioServicio de Clínica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. lucas.aparicio@hospitalitaliano.org.ar.
Luciana Leon CejasSección de Neurologia, Hospital Británico, Buenos Aires, Argentina. lucianaleoncejas@gmail.com.
Rosario LuxardoSección de Nefrología, Servicio de Clínica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina. rosario.luxardo@hospitalitaliano.org.ar.
Paula PopelkaCamara Gamma SRL, Chaco, Argentina. paulapopelka@gmail.com.
Ricardo ReisinServicio de Neurologia, Hospital Britanico, Buenos Aires, Argentina. ricardoreisin@gmail.com.
Pamela SeilikovivhSanatorio Privado San Gerónimo, Santa Fé, Argentina. pameseili@gmail.com.
Carlos Federico VarelaSección de Nefrología, Servicio de Clínica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina. federico.varela@hospitalitaliano.org.ar.
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires · ARHospital Británico de Buenos Aires · ARHospital Privado · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Method: Use the PICO format to generate a series of questions, focusing on the specificity and sensitivity of the amyloidosis diagnostic test. PubMed searches were conducted in English and Spanish from July to August 2019. The level of evidence and recommendation are based on the GRADE system (http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/index.htm). The recommendations are graded according to their direction (for or against) and strength (strong and weak). Finally, it is recommended to use GLIA tools to evaluate the obstacles and facilitators in implementation. Suggested explanation A strong suggestion indicates a high degree of trust in support or opposition to the intervention. When defining a strong recommendation, this guide uses the "recommended" language. The weaker recommendations indicate that the outcome of the intervention (favorable or unfavorable) is doubtful. In this case, if a weak recommendation is defined, the "recommendation" language is used. How to use these guidelines: Recommendations must be explained within the scope of special care in validated diagnostic studies conducted by specially trained doctors. It is not assumed to change the coexistence conditions of the disease process. Presumably, the attending physician has a high degree of suspicion of amyloidosis. It assumes that diagnostic research is conducted by well-trained doctors using a validated standardized method. This guide is intended for health care professionals and those involved in health care policies to help ensure that the necessary agreements have been reached to provide appropriate care. Summary of recommendations For patients with suspected amyloidosis, it is recommended: Measured value of creatinine be used as a preliminary assessment for the diagnosis of renal involvement in patients with suspected renal amyloidosis. 24-hour proteinuria be measured and characterized to diagnose renal involvement in patients with suspected renal amyloidosis. Immunohistochemical staining of skin biopsy for patients genetically diagnosed with ATTR, for early diagnosis of neuropathy. The signs or symptoms of these patients suggest the presence of fine fiber neuropathy. Skin biopsy and immunohistochemical staining for early diagnosis of neuropathy. These patients show signs or symptoms suggesting fine fiber neuropathy. Conduct nerve conduction studies on motor and sensory fibers to diagnose total fiber neuropathy in patients who are diagnosed or suspected of having amyloidosis. Test (Sudoscan) is recommended for the early diagnosis of peripheral autonomic neuropathy (even in asymptomatic patients) in patients with suspected autonomic neuropathy due to amyloidosis. Ewing's standard to measure heart rate variability to diagnose autonomic hypofunction in patients with autonomic neuropathy suspected of having amyloidosis. Measure orthostatic hypotension to diagnose early autonomic hypotension for patients with amyloidosis or systemic amyloidosis suspected of autonomic neuropathy. It is suggested: QST test to diagnose neuropathy early for patients genetically diagnosed with ATTR, if they show signs or symptoms suggesting fine fiber neuropathy Measure alkaline phosphatase to initially assess liver involvement in patients with amyloidosis.

Indexed as

AmyloidosisAutonomic Nervous System DiseasesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicProteinuriaSkinamyloidosisamyloidosis, familialdiagnosisinmunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis

Identifiers

PMID36542592
PMCPMC9987309
OpenAlexW4312112851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.