Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36542586›Full record

ArticleRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina)2022

Tobías Micael Ropoz

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tobías Micael RopozGroupe Renault . lic.ropoztobias@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objetivoConocer las barreras que los/as kinesiólogos/as argentinos presentan a la hora de emprender o mantener su desarrollo profesional continuo. Materiales y método: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo y transversal mediante una encuesta anónima y virtual a través de Google Forms en el mes de julio de 2021. RESULTADO: 229 profesionales completaron el cuestionario. 157 (68,6%) ejercían en la provincia de Córdoba, 19 (8,3%) en Buenos Aires, 11 (4,8%) en Santa Fe y el resto en otras provincias. 106 (46,3%) llevaban trabajando entre 1 a 5 años en la profesión, 42 (18,3%) entre 5 y 9 años, 34 (14,8%) entre 10 y 15 años y 47 (20,5%) más de 15 años. 128 (55,9%) se desempeñaban en el área de traumatología y ortopedia, 77 (31,9%) en respiratorio. 178 (77,7%) pertenecía al sector privado, 17 (7,4%) al sector público y 34 (14,8%) a ambos sectores. Conclusión: Del total de encuestados, el 84,3% manifestó tener barreras para realizar su desarrollo profesional continuo; el 15,7% declaró no tener inconvenientes. La principal barrera fue la economía personal, seguida de la percepción de costo beneficio y la falta de tiempo.

Indexed as

Physical TherapistsHumansRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36542586
PMCPMC9987314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.