Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36542489›Full record

Observational studyRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2023

[Critical points to implement an antibiotic form for management of surgical wound infection].

Andrea Socorro Álvarez-Villaseñor, Diana Florencia Zeceña-Uribe, Jorge Isaac Morales-Alvarado, Jesús Alberto Castorena-Pérez, Clotilde Fuentes-Orozco, Alejandro González-Ojeda

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish AbstractObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea Socorro Álvarez-VillaseñorSecretaría de Salud, Hospital General Juan María de Salvatierra, Servicio de Cirugía General. La Paz, Baja California Sur, México.ORCID 0000-0003-1857-4267
Diana Florencia Zeceña-UribeSecretaría de Salud, Instituto de Cirugía Reconstructiva de Jalisco. Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.ORCID 0000-0003-1099-5155
Jorge Isaac Morales-AlvaradoSecretaría de Salud, Hospital General Juan María de Salvatierra, Servicio de Cirugía General. La Paz, Baja California Sur, México.ORCID 0000-0001-5243-0553
Jesús Alberto Castorena-PérezSecretaría de Salud, Hospital General Juan María de Salvatierra, Servicio de Cirugía General. La Paz, Baja California Sur, México.ORCID 0000-0002-8417-4715
Clotilde Fuentes-OrozcoInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente, Hospital de Especialidades "Lic. Ignacio García Téllez", Unidad de Investigación Biomédica 02. Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.ORCID 0000-0001-6230-8359
Alejandro González-OjedaInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente, Hospital de Especialidades "Lic. Ignacio García Téllez", Unidad de Investigación Biomédica 02. Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.ORCID 0000-0003-2935-8703
Mexican Social Security Institute · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a major complication of surgical procedures and contributes to morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. It is commonly caused by Gram-negative bacteria and should be monitored in hospital units. Objective: To identify critical points to implement an antibiotic form for surgical wound infection management. Material and methods: Descriptive observational study in 100 cultures of wounds with SSI. The most common diagnosis, the microorganism involved, sensitivity to antibiotics and prescription consistency were identified. In addition, demographic variables were assessed and a questionnaire was applied to surgeons in order to identify the critical points to implement a local formulary of antibiotics. Results: 37% of cultures came from female patients. The most common diagnosis was hollow viscus perforation in 31%. The most common microorganism was Escherichia coli ESBL in 20% and 55% of these were sensitive to imipenem. The critical points observed were consistency in the prescription of antimicrobials, which reached only 29%, and that surgeons did not actively participate in strategies for the rational use of antibiotics. Conclusions: As a critical point to implement the antibiotic form, little involvement of surgeons with the hospital infection control team was found. The incidence of SSI was 2.4%, predominantly in emergency surgery. The presence of E. coli ESBL is frequent, with resistance to broad-spectrum antimicrobials.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsSurgical Wound InfectionEscherichia coliFemaleHumansImipenemAnti-Bacterial AgentsImipenemAntibioticsSurgical Wound Infection

Identifiers

PMID36542489
PMCPMC10396021
OpenAlexW4312113135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.