Observational studyRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2023
[Critical points to implement an antibiotic form for management of surgical wound infection].
Observational study in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a major complication of surgical procedures and contributes to morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. It is commonly caused by Gram-negative bacteria and should be monitored in hospital units. Objective: To identify critical points to implement an antibiotic form for surgical wound infection management. Material and methods: Descriptive observational study in 100 cultures of wounds with SSI. The most common diagnosis, the microorganism involved, sensitivity to antibiotics and prescription consistency were identified. In addition, demographic variables were assessed and a questionnaire was applied to surgeons in order to identify the critical points to implement a local formulary of antibiotics. Results: 37% of cultures came from female patients. The most common diagnosis was hollow viscus perforation in 31%. The most common microorganism was Escherichia coli ESBL in 20% and 55% of these were sensitive to imipenem. The critical points observed were consistency in the prescription of antimicrobials, which reached only 29%, and that surgeons did not actively participate in strategies for the rational use of antibiotics. Conclusions: As a critical point to implement the antibiotic form, little involvement of surgeons with the hospital infection control team was found. The incidence of SSI was 2.4%, predominantly in emergency surgery. The presence of E. coli ESBL is frequent, with resistance to broad-spectrum antimicrobials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36542489PMC10396021W4312113135What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.