Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36542426›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Natural Language Processing and Graph Theory: Making Sense of Imaging Records in a Novel Representation Frame.

Laurent Binsfeld Gonçalves, Ivan Nesic, Marko Obradovic, Bram Stieltjes, Thomas Weikert, Jens Bremerich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laurent Binsfeld GonçalvesClinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4425-3304
Ivan NesicClinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4373-8860
Marko ObradovicClinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5975-4008
Bram StieltjesClinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5961-802X
Thomas WeikertClinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9274-053X
Jens BremerichClinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1002-8483

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA concise visualization framework of related reports would increase readability and improve patient management. To this end, temporal referrals to prior comparative exams are an essential connection to previous exams in written reports. Due to unstructured narrative texts' variable structure and content, their extraction is hampered by poor computer readability. Natural language processing (NLP) permits the extraction of structured information from unstructured texts automatically and can serve as an essential input for such a novel visualization framework.

objectiveThis study proposes and evaluates an NLP-based algorithm capable of extracting the temporal referrals in written radiology reports, applies it to all the radiology reports generated for 10 years, introduces a graphical representation of imaging reports, and investigates its benefits for clinical and research purposes.

methodsIn this single-center, university hospital, retrospective study, we developed a convolutional neural network capable of extracting the date of referrals from imaging reports. The model's performance was assessed by calculating precision, recall, and F1-score using an independent test set of 149 reports. Next, the algorithm was applied to our department's radiology reports generated from 2011 to 2021. Finally, the reports and their metadata were represented in a modulable graph.

resultsFor extracting the date of referrals, the named-entity recognition (NER) model had a high precision of 0.93, a recall of 0.95, and an F1-score of 0.94. A total of 1,684,635 reports were included in the analysis. Temporal reference was mentioned in 53.3% (656,852/1,684,635), explicitly stated as not available in 21.0% (258,386/1,684,635), and omitted in 25.7% (317,059/1,684,635) of the reports. Imaging records can be visualized in a directed and modulable graph, in which the referring links represent the connecting arrows.

conclusionsAutomatically extracting the date of referrals from unstructured radiology reports using deep learning NLP algorithms is feasible. Graphs refined the selection of distinct pathology pathways, facilitated the revelation of missing comparisons, and enabled the query of specific referring exam sequences. Further work is needed to evaluate its benefits in clinics, research, and resource planning.

Indexed as

date extractiondeep learninggraph theoryhealth care information systemimaging recordNLPradiologyradiology reportsresource planning.temporal referrals

Identifiers

PMID36542426
PMCPMC9813822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.