Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36542380›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery.

Laurent G Glance, Karen E Joynt Maddox, Michael Mazzefi, Peter W Knight, Michael P Eaton, Changyong Feng, Miklos D Kertai, James Albernathy, Isaac Y Wu, Julie A Wyrobek and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Does socioeconomic status influence the choice of surgical technique in abdominal rectal cancer surgery?Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  8. Rates of Minimally Invasive Surgery After Introduction of Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Common General Surgery Operations.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Laurent G GlanceDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York.
Karen E Joynt MaddoxDepartment of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Michael MazzefiDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville.
Peter W KnightDepartment of Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York.
Michael P EatonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York.
Changyong FengDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York.
Miklos D KertaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
James AlbernathyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland.
Isaac Y WuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York.
Julie A WyrobekDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York.
Marisa CevascoDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Nimesh DesaiDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Andrew W DickRAND Health, RAND, Boston, Massachusetts.
University of Rochester · USRAND Corporation · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Virginia · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

ImpAct of COVID-19 on CaRe TransitOns and Health OutcomeS for Vulnerable PopulationS in Nursing Homes and Home HealthCARE Agencies (ACROSS-CARE)R01AG074492 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHANG, JINGJING, STONE, PATRICIA W. · 2021 to 2024
$3.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG074492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Whether people from racial and ethnic minority groups experience disparities in access to minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) is not known. Objective: To investigate racial and ethnic disparities in the utilization of MIMVS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database for patients who underwent mitral valve surgery between 2014 and 2019. Statistical analysis was performed from January 24 to August 11, 2022. Exposures: Patients were categorized as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic individuals. Main Outcomes and Measures: The association between MIMVS (vs full sternotomy) and race and ethnicity were evaluated using logistic regression. Results: Among the 103 753 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery (mean [SD] age, 62 [13] years; 47 886 female individuals [46.2%]), 10 404 (10.0%) were non-Hispanic Black individuals, 89 013 (85.8%) were non-Hispanic White individuals, and 4336 (4.2%) were Hispanic individuals. Non-Hispanic Black individuals were more likely to have Medicaid insurance (odds ratio [OR], 2.21; 95% CI, 1.64-2.98; P < .001) and to receive care from a low-volume surgeon (OR, 4.45; 95% CI, 4.01-4.93; P < .001) compared with non-Hispanic White individuals. Non-Hispanic Black individuals were less likely to undergo MIMVS (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.58-0.73; P < .001), whereas Hispanic individuals were not less likely to undergo MIMVS compared with non-Hispanic White individuals (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.67-1.75; P = .74). Patients with commercial insurance had 2.35-fold higher odds of undergoing MIMVS (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 2.06-2.68; P < .001) than those with Medicaid insurance. Patients operated by very-high volume surgeons (300 or more cases) had 20.7-fold higher odds (OR, 20.70; 95% CI, 12.7-33.9; P < .001) of undergoing MIMVS compared with patients treated by low-volume surgeons (less than 20 cases). After adjusting for patient risk, non-Hispanic Black individuals were still less likely to undergo MIMVS (adjusted OR [aOR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99; P = .04) and were more likely to die or experience a major complication (aOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.16-1.35; P < .001) compared with non-Hispanic White individuals. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, non-Hispanic Black patients were less likely to undergo MIMVS and more likely to die or experience a major complication than non-Hispanic White patients. These findings suggest that efforts to reduce inequity in cardiovascular medicine may need to include increasing access to private insurance and high-volume surgeons.

Indexed as

EthnicityMitral ValveCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMiddle AgedMinority GroupsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36542380
PMCPMC9857175
OpenAlexW4312106399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.