Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36542308›Full record

Trial reportDrugs in R&D2023

A Randomised Phase I Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Palovarotene Ophthalmic Solution.

William J Foster, Andrew L Strahs, Kent W Small, James M Roach

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drugs in R&D, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04762355 (A Phase 1, Double-Masked, Vehicle-Controlled Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Single and Multiple Ascending Doses of Palovarotene Ophthalmic Solution in Healthy Adult Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04762355 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1, Double-Masked, Vehicle-Controlled Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Single and Multiple Ascending Doses of Palovarotene Ophthalmic Solution in Healthy Adult Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorClementia Pharmaceuticals Inc.Ran2018 to 2019Enrolled48ConditionsDry Eye DiseaseArmsPalovarotene, Vehicle
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

William J FosterAltasciences, Suite 305, 1100 Beaumont Avenue, Mount-Royal, QC, H3P 3H5, Canada. wfoster@altasciences.com.
Andrew L StrahsIpsen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Kent W SmallMolecular Insight Research Foundation, Glendale, CA, USA.
James M RoachIpsen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ipsen (United States) · USAltasciences (Canada) · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivePalovarotene, a selective retinoic acid receptor γ agonist, is under investigation for the treatment of dry eye disease. This study aimed to determine the ocular and systemic safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of palovarotene ophthalmic solution (PVO-OS) in healthy adults.

methodsThis was a randomised, vehicle-controlled phase I study (NCT04762355; retrospectively registered). Participants received either PVO-OS (at 0.025, 0.05 or 0.10 mg/mL) or a vehicle (placebo-to-match PVO-OS) once-daily or twice-daily for seven consecutive days. Safety was assessed by ocular and systemic assessments. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessments were collected before and after dose administration.

resultsThirty-six participants were randomised to PVO-OS and 12 to the vehicle. Overall, 89 treatment-emergent ocular adverse events (TEOAEs) were reported by 22 participants (61.1%) receiving PVO-OS and ten TEOAEs were reported by five participants (41.7%) receiving the vehicle. Erythema, irritation and skin dryness of the eyelid were the most common TEOAEs in participants receiving PVO-OS. The incidence of TEOAEs and eyelid-related findings in the PVO-OS groups increased with ascending dose and frequency compared with participants treated with the vehicle. All TEOAEs were mild (96.6%) or moderate (3.4%) and resolved without sequelae. Plasma palovarotene concentrations were generally measurable for up to 3-4 h for 0.025 mg/mL and 0.05 mg/mL and up to 12 h for 0.10 mg/mL dose regimens, independent of the frequency of administration.

conclusionsPVO-OS was generally well tolerated at doses up to and including 0.10 mg/mL twice daily. Similar pharmacokinetic profiles were observed for the once-daily and twice-daily regimens following multiple ascending doses of PVO-OS.

Indexed as

Ophthalmic SolutionsAdultDouble-Blind MethodHumansPyrazolesStilbenesOphthalmic SolutionsPalovarotenePyrazolesStilbenes

Identifiers

PMID36542308
PMCPMC9985528
OpenAlexW4312064980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.