ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2023
Nanoclays for wound management applications.
Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Accelerating wound healing rates with Cucurbita pepo leaf extract loaded electrospun poly(methyl methacrylate)/Halloysite/Chitosan/CaCO₃ composite nanofibers through in vitro and in vivo assessments.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- Hydrogel Films in Biomedical Applications: Fabrication, Properties and Therapeutic Potential.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Halloysite Nanotubes and Sepiolite for Health Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanotechnology has been comprehensively applied as a new approach to managing wound healing. Particularly, nanoclays are being used to improve traditional wound healing approaches or new therapies. Nanoclays are nanoscale aluminosilicates with remarkable intrinsic properties, including the capacity to promote hemostatic response, anti-inflammatory effects, angiogenesis, and re-epithelization. The main purpose of the present review is focusing on skin lesions, post-surgical wounds, burn wounds, and chronic ulcer skin wounds that can be treated using nanoclays, not only as vehicles for therapeutic molecules' efficacy improvement but also alone due to their native beneficial features. A systematic search of the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases revealed several studies satisfying the purpose of our study. In addition, the selected keywords were used to refine the information. Non-planar hydrous phyllosilicates have been compared with other nanoclays considering their acute specific surface area and loading capacity are strongly influenced by their structure. Nanocomposites in the powder form may be directly incorporated in polymers to form gels, biofilms, and scaffolds that may be adjustable to wound sites. Also, nanoclays can be directly incorporated into polymer mats. Regarding hydrogels/films and mats, nanoclays can improve their mechanical strength, thermal stability, viscosity, and cohesive strength. Additionally, nanoclays are able to control drug release, as well as their skin bioavailability, and seem to be promising candidates to overcome cytotoxicity problems; further in vivo toxicity studies are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.