Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36542255›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2023

Clinical Feasibility and Safety of Scleral Collagen Cross-Linking by Riboflavin and Ultraviolet A in Pathological Myopia Blindness: A Pilot Study.

Yu Li, Yue Qi, Mingshen Sun, Changbin Zhai, Wenbin Wei, Fengju Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. [Controllability and predictability of riboflavin-ultraviolet A collagen cross-linking: advances in experimental techniques and theoretical research].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu LiBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing, 100730, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6889-7729
Yue QiBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing, 100730, China.
Mingshen SunBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing, 100730, China.
Changbin ZhaiBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing, 100730, China.
Wenbin WeiBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing, 100730, China.
Fengju ZhangBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing, 100730, China. zhangfj126@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3715-4164
Beijing Tongren Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81873682Research and transformation application of capital clinical diagnosis and treatment technology by Beijing Municipal Commission of Science and Technology Z201100005520043the 215 High-Level Talent Fund of Beijing Health Government 2013-2-023the priming scientific research foundation for the junior researcher in Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo investigate the feasibility and safety of scleral ultraviolet A (UVA) cross-linking (scleral CXL) on pathologically blindness.

methodsThis was a prospective, observational clinical study. Five patients with monocular blindness due to pathological myopic maculopathy were enrolled. Eyes with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) under 0.05 were defined as experimental eyes. The fellow eyes were defined as control eyes. Patients first underwent posterior scleral reinforcement (PSR) surgery in the control eye. Thereafter, scleral CXL surgery was performed in the experimental eye on the same day. Visual acuity, BCVA, slit lamp biomicroscopic examination, intraocular pressure measurement, corneal specula microscopies, axis length measurement, funduscopy with pupil dilation, color fundus photography, full-field flash electroretinography, optical coherence tomography, and color Doppler flow imaging were performed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery.

resultsNo signs of inflammation were observed after operation and throughout the follow-up period. Retinoschisis was improved, while choroidal neovascularization fibrosis and retinal and choroidal atrophy were unchanged after scleral CXL. There were no statistically significant differences in the ophthalmic artery, central retinal artery, and posterior ciliary artery parameters of color Doppler flow imaging or in retinal thickness, within experimental and control eyes, at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, or 12 months (P > 0.05).

conclusionsThis pilot study verified the feasibility and safety of scleral CXL on human blindness. The UVA-CXL on the sclera of human eyes seems to have the same effect as PSR in preventing progressive pathological myopia in the future.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100042422).

Indexed as

ClinicCross-linkingPathological myopiaSafetySclera

Identifiers

PMID36542255
PMCPMC9768409
OpenAlexW4312105650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.