SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2023
Experiences of perioperative nurses with robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review of qualitative studies.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Training and education of operating room nurses in robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- From Clinical Technique to Interprofessional Implementation and Intelligent Integration: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Interdisciplinary Expansion of Robot-Assisted Spine Surgery.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Article
- Perceived learning curve of the nursing team using the da vinci XI surgical system in a Brazilian university hospital.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Experiential learning in urologic single-port robotic surgery transition training: a qualitative descriptive study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- White paper: robotic cholecystectomy-new technology but safe principles still apply.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and precision nursing in the operating room: transforming perioperative safety and surgical outcomes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- A narrative review and proposed framework for robotic surgical training in Urology for Southeast Asia (SEA): a qualitative survey and expert panel recommendations.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Towards automatic quantification of operating table interaction in operating rooms.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Development of a core competency evaluation index system for specialist nurses in robot-assisted surgery: a Delphi study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Impact of operating room technology on intra-operative nurses' workload and job satisfaction: An observational study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- How experienced robotic nurses adapt to the Hugo™ RAS system.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Job satisfaction, depression severity and quality of life ratings of perioperative nurses in robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Patient satisfaction and quality of life outcomes following robotic-assisted surgery: A survey-based study.Bioinformation · 2024Article
- Demands of surgical teams in robotic-assisted surgery: An assessment of intraoperative workload within different surgical specialties.American journal of surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine the experiences of perioperative nurses with robotic-assisted surgery is needed to improve the robotic-assisted surgery practices. This study systematically reviewed and analysed the qualitative studies concerning perioperative nurses' experiences of robotic-assisted surgery. This systematic literature review included studies up to December 2020. The study data were analysed using inductive content analysis. This systematic review included six articles. There were a total of 71 nurses who participated in the included articles (min = 6, max = 17). Their mean age was 35.7, and their experience in robotic-assisted surgery ranged from 8 months to 10 years. Content analysis generated six categories: adaptation to robotic-assisted surgery technology, the importance of teamwork in robotic-assisted surgery, changing tasks and responsibilities in robotic-assisted surgery, training requirements for robotic-assisted surgery, the effects of robotic-assisted surgery on patients and patient safety, and difficulties with robotic-assisted surgery. A variety of themes and sub-themes emerged in these categories. The review highlights the importance of developing new ways of thinking about the assessment and management of disruptions, developing different teamwork patterns and communication skills, and overcoming the challenges involved in technologically advanced surgeries. Nurses' roles in robotic technology should be redefined in healthcare. Nurses should learn how to adapt to advancing technology and how to supplement and enhance their skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.