ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2022
Effects of landscape characteristics, anthropogenic factors, and seasonality on water quality in Portland, Oregon.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of river water quality in Rourkela Odisha using multiple indices to inform sustainable water management.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Impact of climate change on the water resources of the Atbara River using novel hydrological models.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urban areas often struggle with deteriorated water quality because of complex interactions between landscape factors and climatic variables. However, few studies have considered the effects of landscape variables on water quality at a sub-500-m scale. We conducted a spatial statistical analysis of six pollutants for 128 water quality stations in four watersheds around Portland, Oregon, using data from 2015 to 2021 for the wet season at two microscales (100 m and 250 m buffers). E. coli was associated with land cover, soil type, topography, and pipe length, while lead variations were best explained by topographic variables. Developed land cover and impervious surface explained variations in nitrate, while orthophosphate was associated with mean elevation. Models for zinc included land cover and topographic variables in addition to pipe length. Spatial regression models better explain variations in water quality than ordinary least squares models, indicating strong spatial autocorrelation for some variables. Our findings provide valuable insights to city planners and researchers seeking to improve water quality in metropolitan areas by manipulating city landscapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.