Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36542191›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2023

Antimicrobial activity of organic acids against canine skin bacteria.

Lucia Štempelová, Ivana Kubašová, Dobroslava Bujňáková, Lívia Karahutová, Jana Gálová, Erik Kužma, Viola Strompfová

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A naturally isolated symbioticCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lucia ŠtempelováCentre of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01, Košice, Slovakia.
Ivana KubašováCentre of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01, Košice, Slovakia.
Dobroslava BujňákováCentre of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01, Košice, Slovakia.
Lívia KarahutováCentre of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01, Košice, Slovakia.
Jana GálováUniversity of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Small Animal Clinic, Komenského 73, 041 81, Košice, Slovakia.
Erik KužmaVeterinary ambulance, Rosná 3, 040 01, Košice, Slovakia.
Viola StrompfováCentre of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01, Košice, Slovakia. strompfv@saske.sk.
Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKInstitute of Animal Physiology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKUniversity of Veterinary Medicine in Košice · SK

Funding

Ministerstvo školstva, vedy, výskumu a športu Slovenskej republiky VEGA 2/0006/20Ministerstvo školstva, vedy, výskumu a športu Slovenskej republiky,Slovakia VEGA 2/0010/21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canine skin is often a source of bacterial strains that are characterized by the presence of important virulence factors and a high antimicrobial resistance. These bacteria are involved in the pathogenesis of infectious skin diseases, which are very frequent in dogs. Moreover, canine skin isolates are easily spread to other animals and humans. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inhibitory and bactericidal activity of eight organic acids (L-lactic, acetic, propionic, butyric, citric, succinic, glycolic, L-ascorbic acid) against 14 canine skin isolates (11 Gram-positive and three Gram-negative species). The advantages of the tested organic acids are their gentleness to the skin and their affordability. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) were determined by the broth microdilution method. All tested acids showed a bactericidal effect against the selected bacteria, with the exception of their bacteriostatic effect against the Bacillus cereus strain. The lowest MIC showed acetic acid (MIC between 0.5 and 2.0 mg/mL) and propionic acid (MIC 0.8 - 3.3 mg/mL), whereas L-ascorbic acid (MIC 4.0 - 16.0 mg/mL) seems to be weaker among the tested acids. Two Staphylococcus aureus strains and a strain of Escherichia coli were observed to be more resistant compared to coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaAcetic AcidAnimalsAscorbic AcidDogsHumansLactic AcidMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcusAcetic AcidAnti-Bacterial AgentsAscorbic AcidLactic AcidAntimicrobial effectDogMicrobiotaOrganic acidSkin

Identifiers

PMID36542191
OpenAlexW4312066623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.