ArticleSurgery today2023
Impact of combined resection of the internal iliac artery on loss of volume of the gluteus muscles after pelvic exenteration.
Article in Surgery today, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo clarify the influence of additional internal iliac artery (IIA) resection on the loss of the gluteus muscle volume after pelvic exenteration (PE).
methodsThe subjects of this retrospective analysis were 78 patients who underwent PE with or without IIA resection (n = 44 and n = 34, respectively) between 2006 and 2018. The areas of gluteal muscles (GMs) and psoas muscles (PSMs) were calculated using CT images before and 6 months after PE, and the difference was compared.
resultsThe volumes of the GMs and PSMs were significantly reduced after PE (P < 0.001 and P = 0.005, respectively). In the IIA resection group, the GMs were significantly reduced after surgery, but the PSMs were not. The maximum GM (Gmax) was the most atrophied among the GMs. Multivariable analysis revealed that complete IIA resection was an independent promotor of the loss of volume of the Gmax (P = 0.044). In 18 patients with unilateral IIA resection, the downsizing rate of the Gmax was significantly greater on the resected side than on the non-resected side (P = 0.008).
conclusionsThe GMs and PSMs were significantly smaller after PE. Complete IIA resection reduced the Gmax area remarkably. Preservation of the superior gluteus artery is likely to help maintain Gmax size, suggesting a potential preventative measure against secondary sarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.