Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36542078›Full record

ReviewStroke2023

How Much Attention Do We Pay to Attention Deficits in Poststroke Aphasia?

Maria Varkanitsa, Erin Godecke, Swathi Kiran

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stroke, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07198048 (Treating Attention and Language in Post-stroke Aphasia Using a Music-based Intervention.), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07198048 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Treating Attention and Language in Post-stroke Aphasia Using a Music-based Intervention.

TypeinterventionalSponsorPurdue UniversityRan2025 to 2028Enrolled45ConditionsAphasia, Stroke, Stroke and Aphasia, Stroke HemorrhagicArmsMusic-Based Therapy for Post Stroke Aphasia, Audiobook Intervention for Post Stroke Aphasia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cognitive Functions Supporting Learning Over Time in Naming Treatment for Aphasia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Insights gained over 60 years on factors shaping post-stroke aphasia recovery: A commentary on Vignolo (1964).Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria VarkanitsaAphasia Research Laboratory, Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation, Boston, MA (M.V., S.K.).ORCID 0000-0001-6040-6254
Erin GodeckeEdith Cowan University and Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia (E.G.).ORCID 0000-0002-7210-1295
Swathi KiranAphasia Research Laboratory, Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation, Boston, MA (M.V., S.K.).ORCID 0000-0003-1586-8913
Language Science (South Korea) · KRSir Charles Gairdner Hospital · AU

Funding

Functional reorganization of the language and domain-general multiple demand systems in aphasiaR01DC016950 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI FEDORENKO, EVELINA, KIRAN, SWATHI · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although language deficits are the primary area of weakness, people with poststroke aphasia often experience challenges with nonlinguistic cognitive skills, including attention processing. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the evidence for the relationship between attention deficits and language deficits in people with poststroke aphasia. Three different types of studies are reviewed: (1) studies exploring whether people with poststroke aphasia exhibit concomitant attention and language deficits, (2) studies explicitly exploring the relationship between attention and language deficits in people with poststroke aphasia, and (3) either language or attention (or both) treatment studies exploring whether treatment gains in one domain generalize to the other. In the last section, we briefly review research evidence for the neural basis of the attention-language relationship in aphasia.

Indexed as

AphasiaStrokeHumansLanguageaphasiaattentionlanguage

Identifiers

PMID36542078
PMCPMC9927868
OpenAlexW4312113588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.