ArticleCurrent protocols2022
CRISPR-Suppressor Scanning for Systematic Discovery of Drug-Resistance Mutations.
Article in Current protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- ITGB1 Regulates Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Development by Modulating the Tumor Microenvironment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- CRISPR-Cas9: Transforming Functional Genomics, Precision Medicine, and Drug Development - Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.Current gene therapy · 2026Review
- Orthogonal resistance mechanisms of classical- and induced-proximity inhibitors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- CRISPR/Cas9 Screening Highlights PFKFB3 Gene as a Major Contributor to 5-Fluorouracil Resistance in Esophageal Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
- Drug addiction unveils a repressive methylation ceiling in EZH2-mutant lymphoma.Nature chemical biology · 2023Article
- Base editor screens for in situ mutational scanning at scale.Molecular cell · 2023Review
- Activity-based CRISPR scanning uncovers allostery in DNA methylation maintenance machinery.eLife · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technologies have enabled complex genetic manipulations in situ, including large-scale, pooled screening approaches to probe and uncover mechanistic insights across various biological processes. The RNA-programmable nature of CRISPR-Cas9 greatly empowers tiling mutagenesis approaches to elucidate molecular details of protein function, in particular the interrogation of mechanisms of resistance to small molecules, an approach termed CRISPR-suppressor scanning. In a typical CRISPR-suppressor scanning experiment, a pooled library of single-guide RNAs is designed to target across the coding sequence(s) of one or more genes, enabling the Cas9 nuclease to systematically mutate the targeted proteins and generate large numbers of diverse protein variants in situ. This cellular pool of protein variants is then challenged with drug treatment to identify mutations conferring a fitness advantage. Drug-resistance mutations identified with this approach can not only elucidate drug mechanism of action but also reveal deeper mechanistic insights into protein structure-function relationships. In this article, we outline the framework for a standard CRISPR-suppressor scanning experiment. Specifically, we provide instructions for the design and construction of a pooled sgRNA library, execution of a CRISPR-suppressor scanning screen, and basic computational analysis of the resulting data. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Design and generation of a pooled sgRNA library Support Protocol 1: sgRNA library design using command-line CRISPOR Support Protocol 2: Production and titering of pooled sgRNA library lentivirus Basic Protocol 2: Execution and analysis of a CRISPR-suppressor scanning experiment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.