Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36541688›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2023

Introducing a Real-Time Method for Identifying the Predictors of Noncompliance with Event-Based Reporting of Tobacco Use in Ecological Momentary Assessment.

Ashley D Kendall, Charles S H Robinson, Kathleen R Diviak, Donald Hedeker, Robin J Mermelstein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Longitudinal User Engagement with Microinteraction Ecological Momentary Assessment (μEMA).Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley D KendallCenter for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8875-0049
Charles S H RobinsonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9184-525X
Kathleen R DiviakInstitute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2797-4193
Donald HedekerDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8134-6094
Robin J MermelsteinInstitute for Health Research and Policy and Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8690-1074
Chicago Department of Public Health · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Pilot Program CoreP30ES027792 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Gokhan M. Mutlu, Gail S Prins · 2017 to 2026
$13.6M
Context and Subjective Experience Surrounding Dual Cigarette and E Cigarette UseR01CA184681 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MERMELSTEIN, ROBIN J. · 2015 to 2019
$4.1M
Integrative Training in the Neurobiology of Addictive BehaviorsT32DA043469 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Donald Hedeker, Xiaoxi Zhuang · 2017 to 2026
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA184681NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA043469NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES027792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the factors that bias event-based (i.e., self-initiated) reporting of health behaviors in ecological momentary assessment (EMA) due to the difficulty inherent to tracking failures to self-initiate reports. PURPOSE: To introduce a real-time method for identifying the predictors of noncompliance with event-based reporting.

methodsN = 410 adults who used both cigarettes and e-cigarettes completed a 1-week EMA protocol that combined random reporting of current contexts with event-based reporting of tobacco use. Each random assessment first asked if participants were currently using tobacco and, if so, the assessment converted into a "randomly captured" event report-indicating failure to self-initiate that report. Multilevel modeling tested predictors of failing to complete random reports and failing to self-initiate event reports.

resultsOn the person level, male sex, higher average cigarette rate, and higher average cigarette urge each predicted missing random reports. The person-level predictors of failing to self-initiate event reports were older age, higher average cigarette and e-cigarette rates, higher average cigarette urge, and being alone more on average; the moment-level predictors were lower cigarette urge, lower positive affect, alcohol use, and cannabis use. Strikingly, the randomly captured events comprised more of the total EMA reports (28%) than did the self-initiated event reports (24%). These report types were similar across most variables, with some exceptions, such as momentary cannabis use predicting the random capture of tobacco events.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated a method of identifying predictors of noncompliance with event-based reporting of tobacco use and enhancing the real-time capture of events.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsAdultAlcohol DrinkingEcological Momentary AssessmentHumansMaleTobacco UseComplianceEcological momentary assessment (EMA)Event-based reportingMissingnessTobacco

Identifiers

PMID36541688
PMCPMC10305801
OpenAlexW4312065713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.