Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36541537›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2022

Instructional review of key factors to achieve successful outcomes when using low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in fracture repair.

Andrew J Harrison, Michael R Redler, David M Taylor, Ansar Mahmood, John T Jones, Yukihiro Arai, Yoshinobu Watanabe

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrew J HarrisonBioventus International, Taurusavenue, Hoofddorp, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9543-8248
Michael R RedlerConnecticut Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Virginia, Frank H. Netter School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, USA.
David M TaylorLeeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Ansar MahmoodDepartment Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
John T JonesStatistician - Raleigh, NC.
Yukihiro AraiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine.
Yoshinobu WatanabeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine.
Teikyo University · JPLeeds General Infirmary · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBQuinnipiac University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) treatment of fractures has been available to the orthopaedic community for nearly three decades; however, it is still considered an experimental treatment by some clinicians, even though there is a wealth of clinical data. Based on the evaluation of clinical trial data, we have established key criteria which can lead to LIPUS success and avoid failure. These are fracture gap size and stability, accurate transducer placement and minimum treatment number. However, from a clinician's view, the correct attitude to treatment must be observed, and this has also been discussed. It is hoped, armed with this new evaluation of the clinical data, that clinicians can treat patients with LIPUS more effectively, resulting in fewer failures of treatment.

Indexed as

fractureLIPUSultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36541537
PMCPMC9880906
OpenAlexW4312043244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.