Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36541501›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2023

School nursing: New ways of working with children and young people during the Covid-19 pandemic: A scoping review.

Georgia Cook, Jane V Appleton, Sarah Bekaert, Tikki Harrold, Julie Taylor, Dana Sammut

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Georgia CookCentre for Psychological Research, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1651-866X
Jane V AppletonFormerly OxINMAHR (Oxford Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Research), Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Sarah BekaertOxford School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6128-931X
Tikki HarroldOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, EOHC, Oxford, UK.
Julie TaylorSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Dana SammutSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6593-4782

Funding

General Nursing Council for England and Wales Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo examine how school nurse practice evolved as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic.

designA scoping review of international literature, conducted and reported in line with Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework. DATA SOURCES: Searches were conducted in September 2021. Ten databases were searched: The British Nursing Database, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Consumer Health Database, Health and Medicine, Nursing and Allied Health, Public Health, PsycINFO, PubMed and Web of Science. Relevant grey literature was identified through hand searching. REVIEW

methodsA minimum of three reviewers independently screened articles and two reviewers independently undertook data extraction, with any decisions made collaboratively with the wider team. Much of the literature was not empirical work and so it was not possible to apply a traditional quality appraisal framework.

resultsSearches identified 554 papers (after deduplication) which were screened against title and abstract. Following the full-text review, 38 articles underwent data extraction and analysis. The review findings highlighted that school nurses adapted their practice to ensure they were able to continue providing their formal and informal school health offer to children, young people and their families and continued working closely with the multidisciplinary team. In addition, the expanded public health role generated by Covid-19 for school nurses' work was considerable, multi-layered and added to their routine workload. School nurses displayed resilience, adaptability and creativity in their response to delivering services during Covid-19.

conclusionSchool nurses took on a leading public health role during the Covid-19 pandemic. Some developments and practices were highlighted as beneficial to continue beyond the pandemic. However, formal evaluation is needed to identify which practices may merit integration into routine practice. Continued investment in staff and infrastructure will be essential to ensuring school nurses continue to expand their practice and influence as public health experts.

Indexed as

COVID-19School NursingAdolescentChildHumansPandemicsadolescent healthfamily carehealth services researchliterature reviewpublic health nursingschool nursing

Identifiers

PMID36541501
PMCPMC9877849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.