Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36541480›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2023

Age-related differences in functional network segregation in the context of sex and reproductive stage.

Hannah K Ballard, T Bryan Jackson, Abigail C Symm, Tracey H Hicks, Jessica A Bernard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The progression of sex differences in brain networks across the lifespan.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hannah K BallardTexas A&M Institute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1892-3949
T Bryan JacksonDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6318-1916
Abigail C SymmDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Tracey H HicksDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Jessica A BernardTexas A&M Institute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7697-3675
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

A longitudinal investigation of the cerebellum in adulthood: anatomical and network changes, motor function, and cognitionR01AG064010 · NIA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, JESSICA ANN · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H008217/1Medical Research CouncilNIA NIH HHS R01 AG064010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age is accompanied by differences in the organization of functional brain networks, which impact behavior in adulthood. Functional networks become less segregated and more integrated with age. However, sex differences in network segregation declines with age are not well-understood. Further, network segregation in the context of female reproductive stage is relatively understudied, though unmasking such relationships would be informative for elucidating biological mechanisms that contribute to sex-specific differences in aging. In the current work, we used data from the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) repository to evaluate differences in resting-state network segregation as a product of sex and reproductive stage. Reproductive stage was categorized using the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop (STRAW+10) criteria. Replicating prior work, we investigated the following functional networks: auditory, cerebellar-basal ganglia, cingulo-opercular task control, default mode, dorsal attention, fronto-parietal task control, salience, sensory somatomotor mouth, sensory somatomotor hand, ventral attention, and visual. First, our results mirror findings from previous work indicating that network segregation is lower with increasing age. Second, when analyzing associations between network segregation and age within each sex separately, we find qualitative differences between females and males. Finally, we report significant effects of reproductive stage on network segregation, though these findings are likely driven by age. Broadly, our results suggest that impacts of sex may be important to evaluate when investigating network segregation differences across adulthood, though further work is needed to determine the unique role of menopause and sex hormones on the organization of functional brain networks within aging females.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgingBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleNeural Pathwaysagingfunctional connectivitymenopausenetwork segregationsex differences

Identifiers

PMID36541480
PMCPMC9980887
OpenAlexW4312070131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.