Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36541385›Full record

ArticleActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2022

Hearing outcomes and patient satisfaction after stapes surgery: local

Beatrice Giannoni, Federica Pollastri, Chiara Adembri, Dina Straticò, Paolo Vannucchi, Alessia Stival, Curzio Checcucci, Chiara Bruno, Rudi Pecci

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Stapedoplasty without sedation in an office-based setting.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Beatrice GiannoniUnit of Audiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Federica PollastriUnit of Audiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Chiara AdembriDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Unit of Anesthesiology, University of Florence, Italy.
Dina StraticòUnit of Audiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Paolo VannucchiUnit of Audiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Alessia StivalUnit of Audiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Curzio CheccucciDepartment of Physycs and Astronomy, University of Florence, Italy.
Chiara BrunoUnit of Otorhinolaryngology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Rudi PecciUnit of Audiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Otosclerosis is a frequent ear disorder causing a stapedo-ovalar ankylosis and conductive hearing loss. Stapedoplasty, performed under both general (GA) and local anaesthesia (LA), is the most advisable surgical solution. Auditory recovery relies on the patient's conditions and on the intervention itself. The aim of our work was to compare hearing outcomes with stapedoplasty performed under GA or LA and to investigate patients' compliance to both methods. Methods: Fifty-five otosclerotic patients underwent stapedoplasty both under GA (32/55) and LA (23/55). Pre- and post-operative air and bone tone audiometry threshold values as well as the air-bone gap and its closure score, were analysed. All patients filled in a satisfaction questionnaire regarding their concern and level of appreciation of the type of anaesthesia. Results and conclusions: Our data show that the auditory results with stapedoplasty are good and do not differ between LA and GA. Even considering the advantages and limits of the two methods, one cannot favour one or the other type of anaesthesia. Finally, the patient's satisfaction cannot be considered a criterion of choice, since this was found to be high in both cases.

Indexed as

OtosclerosisStapes SurgeryAnesthesia, GeneralAudiometry, Pure-ToneAuditory ThresholdBone ConductionHearingHearing Loss, ConductiveHumansPatient SatisfactionRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomegeneral anaesthesialocal anaesthesiaotosclerosisstapedoplastystapes surgery

Identifiers

PMID36541385
PMCPMC9793144
OpenAlexW4312094906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.