Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36541355›Full record

ArticleNursing in critical care2023

Patients' perspectives of recovery after COVID-19 critical illness: An interview study.

Suzanne Bench, Helen Cherry, Matthew Hodson, Alison James, Nicola McGuinness, Gaby Parker, Nicola Thomas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing in critical care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Surviving COVID-19: patients' experiences of care and path to recovery.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzanne BenchDirector of Nursing and Professor of critical care nursing, London South Bank University, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4499-2959
Helen CherryPatient representative.
Matthew HodsonNorth Central Division, Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Alison JamesDirector of Nursing and Professor of critical care nursing, London South Bank University, London, UK.
Nicola McGuinnessInstitute of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK.
Gaby ParkerCentral London Community Healthcare- Hertfordshire Division, Harpenden Memorial Hospital, Harpenden, UK.
Nicola ThomasDirector of Nursing and Professor of critical care nursing, London South Bank University, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8311-7356
London South Bank University · GBCentral London Community Healthcare NHS Trust · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Burdett Trust for Nursing
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritical illness is a traumatic experience, often resulting in post-intensive care syndrome, affecting people's physical, psychological, emotional, and social well-being. The early recovery period is associated with increased risk, negatively impacting longer-term outcomes.

aimsThe aims of this study were to understand the recovery and rehabilitation needs of people who survive a COVID-19 critical illness. STUDY

designAn exploratory descriptive qualitative interview study with 20 survivors of COVID-19 critical illness from two community-based healthcare settings in London, England. Data collection took place September 2020-April 2021, at least 1 month after hospital discharge by telephone or virtual platform. Data were subjected to inductive thematic analysis and mapped deductively to the three core concepts of self-determination theory: autonomy, competence and relatedness.

resultsThree key themes emerged: traumatic experience, human connection and navigating a complex system. Participants described how societal restrictions, fear and communication problems caused by the pandemic added to their trauma and the challenge of recovery. The importance of positive human connections, timely information and support to navigate the system was emphasized.

conclusionsWhilst findings to some extent mirror those of other qualitative pre-pandemic studies, our findings highlight how the uncertainty and instability caused by the pandemic add to the challenge of recovery affecting all core concepts of self-determination (autonomy, competence, relatedness). RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Understanding survivors' perspectives of rehabilitation needs following COVID-19 critical illness is vital to delivery of safe, high-quality care. To optimize chances of effective recovery, survivors desire a specialist, co-ordinated and personalized recovery pathway, which reflects humanized care. This should be considered when planning future service provisions.

Indexed as

COVID-19Intensive Care UnitsCritical IllnessHumansPatient DischargeQualitative ResearchCOVID-19critical illnessinterviewsqualitativerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36541355
PMCPMC9877659
OpenAlexW4312065306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.