Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36541263›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2023

How nurses use National Early Warning Score and Individual Early Warning Score to support their patient risk assessment practice: A fieldwork study.

Caroline S Langkjaer, Karin Bundgaard, Gitte Bunkenborg, Pernille B Nielsen, Kasper K Iversen, Morten H Bestle, Dorthe G Bove

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline S LangkjaerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1543-3621
Karin BundgaardClinical Nursing Research Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Gitte BunkenborgDepartment of Anesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Holbaek, Holbaek, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6663-9275
Pernille B NielsenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kasper K IversenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten H BestleDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dorthe G BoveUniversity College Absalon, Centre for Nursing, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4407-0225
University of Copenhagen · DKAarhus University · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKGentofte Hospital · DKUniversity College Absalon · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine 3581Nordsjaellands Hospital Research grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore and describe how the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and Individual Early Warning Score (I-EWS) are used and how they support nurses' patient risk assessment practice.

designA qualitative observational fieldwork study drawing on ethnographical principles was performed in six hospitals in two regions of Denmark in 2019.

methodsData were generated from participant observations and informal interviews with 32 nurses across 15 different wards in the hospitals. A total of 180 h of participant observation was performed. The observations lasted between 1.5 and 8 h and were conducted during day or evening shifts.

resultsNEWS and I-EWS supported nurses' observations of patients, providing useful knowledge for planning patient care, and prompting critical thinking. However, the risk assessment task was sometimes delegated to less experienced staff members, such as nursing students and healthcare assistants. The Early Warning Score (EWS) systems were often adapted by nurses according to contextual aspects, such as the culture of the speciality in which the nurses worked and their levels of competency. In some situations, I-EWS had the effect of enhancing nurse autonomy and responsibility for decision-making in relation to patient care.

conclusionsEWS systems support nurses' patient risk assessment practice, providing useful information. I-EWS makes it easier to factor the heterogeneity of patients and the clinical situation into the risk assessments. The delegation of risk assessment to other, less experienced staff members pose a risk to patient safety, which needs to be addressed in the ongoing debate regarding the shortage of nurses. IMPACT: The findings of this study can help ward nurses, hospital managers and policymakers to develop and improve strategies for improved person-centred nursing care.

Indexed as

Early Warning ScoreNursesNursing Staff, HospitalHospitalsHumansQualitative ResearchRisk Assessmentdecision-makingearly warning scoreethnographynursingobservation practiceparticipant observationqualitative researchrisk assessmenttrack and trigger system

Identifiers

PMID36541263
PMCPMC10107488
OpenAlexW4312065038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.