ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2024
Anatomic and Biomechanical Study of Thumb Carpometacarpal Dislocations: A Laboratory Study.
Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNo previous study recreating an isolated thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) dislocation with or without suture augmentation has been performed in the laboratory. This investigation aimed to evaluate the mechanism and ligamentous complex of isolated thumb CMC dislocations.
methodsBiomechanical analysis was performed in 10 cadaveric specimens. A posteriorly directed force or axial loading with hyperflexion through the CMC joint was applied. Load was applied at a rate of 1 mm/s until posterior CMC dislocation was achieved. Maximum load, displacement under nominal loading, stiffness, and mode of failure were recorded. The native ligament was repaired, augmented with high-tensile suture, and testing was repeated.
resultsPosteriorly directed force produced posterior CMC dislocations, while axial loading and hyperflexion through the CMC joint caused fractures. Load-to-failure of the native CMC joint was 217.76 N (SD = 66.03). Stiffness of the ligamentous complex on average was 18.86 N/mm (SD = 8.83). Mean load-to-failure after repair with suture augmentation was 94.62 N (SD = 39.77), with average stiffness of 8.21 N/mm (SD = 3.06). The native ligament was noted to have greater stiffness (
conclusionIsolated CMC dislocation was achieved with a posteriorly directed force rather than hyperflexion of the joint. Ultimate failure load of the repaired ligaments with suture augmentation was about half of that of the native ligaments. Further research into this technique is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.