ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2023
Federated Learning for Sparse Bayesian Models with Applications to Electronic Health Records and Genomics.
Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safeguarding patient privacy in eHealth systems: Bridging theory and practice through a scoping review and healthcare survey.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Improving Pancreatic Cyst Management: Artificial Intelligence-Powered Prediction of Advanced Neoplasms through Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Confocal Endomicroscopy.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Federated learning is becoming increasingly more popular as the concern of privacy breaches rises across disciplines including the biological and biomedical fields. The main idea is to train models locally on each server using data that are only available to that server and aggregate the model (not data) information at the global level. While federated learning has made significant advancements for machine learning methods such as deep neural networks, to the best of our knowledge, its development in sparse Bayesian models is still lacking. Sparse Bayesian models are highly interpretable with natural uncertain quantification, a desirable property for many scientific problems. However, without a federated learning algorithm, their applicability to sensitive biological/biomedical data from multiple sources is limited. Therefore, to fill this gap in the literature, we propose a new Bayesian federated learning framework that is capable of pooling information from different data sources without breaching privacy. The proposed method is conceptually simple to understand and implement, accommodates sampling heterogeneity (i.e., non-iid observations) across data sources, and allows for principled uncertainty quantification. We illustrate the proposed framework with three concrete sparse Bayesian models, namely, sparse regression, Markov random field, and directed graphical models. The application of these three models is demonstrated through three real data examples including a multi-hospital COVID-19 study, breast cancer protein-protein interaction networks, and gene regulatory networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36541002PMC9782716What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.