ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2023
Predictive modeling using shape statistics for interpretable and robust quality assurance of automated contours in radiation treatment planning.
Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical evaluation of three deep learning contouring models for head and neck organs at risk and lymph node levels.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Atlas and Neural Network Autosegmentation Methods for Pediatric Craniospinal Irradiation With the Development of a Knowledge-Based Quality Assurance Tool.Advances in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Analyzing the Relationship between Dose and Geometric Agreement Metrics for Auto-Contouring in Head and Neck Normal Tissues.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning methods for image segmentation and contouring are gaining prominence as an automated approach for delineating anatomical structures in medical images during radiation treatment planning. These contours are used to guide radiotherapy treatment planning, so it is important that contouring errors are flagged before they are used for planning. This creates a need for effective quality assurance methods to enable the clinical use of automated contours in radiotherapy. We propose a novel method for contour quality assurance that requires only shape features, making it independent of the platform used to obtain the images. Our method uses a random forest classifier to identify low-quality contours. On a dataset of 312 kidney contours, our method achieved a cross-validated area under the curve of 0.937 in identifying unacceptable contours. We applied our method to an unlabeled validation dataset of 36 kidney contours. We flagged 6 contours which were then reviewed by a cervix contour specialist, who found that 4 of the 6 contours contained errors. We used Shapley values to characterize the specific shape features that contributed to each contour being flagged, providing a starting point for characterizing the source of the contouring error. These promising results suggest our method is feasible for quality assurance of automated radiotherapy contours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36540994PMC10091357W4309847880What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.