Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36540994›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2023

Predictive modeling using shape statistics for interpretable and robust quality assurance of automated contours in radiation treatment planning.

Zachary T Wooten, Cenji Yu, Laurence E Court, Christine B Peterson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zachary T WootenDepartment of Statistics, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005, USA, ztw5@rice.edu.
Cenji Yu
Laurence E Court
Christine B Peterson
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USRice University · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Training Program in Biostatistics for Cancer ResearchT32CA096520 · NCI · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI KIMMEL, MAREK, YUAN, YING · 2003 to 2023
$4.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS T32 CA096520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning methods for image segmentation and contouring are gaining prominence as an automated approach for delineating anatomical structures in medical images during radiation treatment planning. These contours are used to guide radiotherapy treatment planning, so it is important that contouring errors are flagged before they are used for planning. This creates a need for effective quality assurance methods to enable the clinical use of automated contours in radiotherapy. We propose a novel method for contour quality assurance that requires only shape features, making it independent of the platform used to obtain the images. Our method uses a random forest classifier to identify low-quality contours. On a dataset of 312 kidney contours, our method achieved a cross-validated area under the curve of 0.937 in identifying unacceptable contours. We applied our method to an unlabeled validation dataset of 36 kidney contours. We flagged 6 contours which were then reviewed by a cervix contour specialist, who found that 4 of the 6 contours contained errors. We used Shapley values to characterize the specific shape features that contributed to each contour being flagged, providing a starting point for characterizing the source of the contouring error. These promising results suggest our method is feasible for quality assurance of automated radiotherapy contours.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID36540994
PMCPMC10091357
OpenAlexW4309847880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.