ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2023
An Approach to Identifying and Quantifying Bias in Biomedical Data.
Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gene-based calibration of high-throughput functional assays for clinical variant classification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data biases are a known impediment to the development of trustworthy machine learning models and their application to many biomedical problems. When biased data is suspected, the assumption that the labeled data is representative of the population must be relaxed and methods that exploit a typically representative unlabeled data must be developed. To mitigate the adverse effects of unrepresentative data, we consider a binary semi-supervised setting and focus on identifying whether the labeled data is biased and to what extent. We assume that the class-conditional distributions were generated by a family of component distributions represented at different proportions in labeled and unlabeled data. We also assume that the training data can be transformed to and subsequently modeled by a nested mixture of multivariate Gaussian distributions. We then develop a multi-sample expectation-maximization algorithm that learns all individual and shared parameters of the model from the combined data. Using these parameters, we develop a statistical test for the presence of the general form of bias in labeled data and estimate the level of this bias by computing the distance between corresponding class-conditional distributions in labeled and unlabeled data. We first study the new methods on synthetic data to understand their behavior and then apply them to real-world biomedical data to provide evidence that the bias estimation procedure is both possible and effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36540987PMC9782737What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.