Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36540873›Full record

ArticleNewborn (Clarksville, Md.)

Risk Prediction for Stillbirth and Neonatal Mortality in Low-resource Settings.

Vivek V Shukla, Waldemar A Carlo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Newborn (Clarksville, Md.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vivek V ShuklaDivision of Neonatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1580-1049
Waldemar A CarloDivision of Neonatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.

Funding

Interventions to Reduce Infant Mortality and Morbidity in Low Resource SettingsUG1HD078437 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI WALDEMAR A. CARLO FONT · 2018 to 2026
$5.6M
NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD078437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High stillbirth and neonatal mortality are major public health problems, particularly in low-resource settings in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Despite sustained efforts by national and international organizations over the last several decades, quality intrapartum and neonatal care is not universally available, especially in these low-resource settings. A few studies identify risk factors for adverse perinatal outcomes in low-resource settings in LMICs. This review highlights the evidence of risk prediction for stillbirth and neonatal death. Evidence using advanced machine-learning statistical models built on data from low-resource settings in LMICs suggests that the predictive accuracy for intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal mortality using prenatal and pre-delivery data is low. Models with delivery and post-delivery data have good predictive accuracy of the risk for neonatal mortality. Birth weight is the most important predictor of neonatal mortality. Further validation and testing of the models in other low-resource settings and subsequent development and testing of possible interventions could advance the field.

Indexed as

Low- and middle-income countriesMortality fetalMortality neonatalNeonatalNewborn infantPerinatal mortalityPreterm infantsResuscitationStillbirth

Identifiers

PMID36540873
PMCPMC9762612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.