Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36540772›Full record

ArticleCities (London, England)2021

The influence of COVID-19 on the societal mobility of urban spaces.

Reza Askarizad, He Jinliao, Setareh Jafari

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cities (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of COVID-19 policies on pedestrian traffic and walking patterns.Environment and planning. B, urban analytics and city science · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tempo-Spatial Modelling of the Spread of COVID-19 in Urban Spaces.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Reza AskarizadThe Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, Institute of Urban Development, East China Normal University, 200062, China.
He JinliaoThe Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, Institute of Urban Development, East China Normal University, 200062, China.
Setareh JafariDepartment of Architecture, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The previous literature in relation to the ongoing pandemic has revealed that COVID-19 may have a negative impact on social mobility and interactions within public urban spaces. While the present study has substantiated that there was no significant difference between people's use of urban spaces before and after the onset of COVID-19. Meanwhile, after the call off of the lockdown, people have shown a very strong desire for social interactions in sociable locations. This fact has revealed the novelty of present study. However, the pedestrians' propensity for commercial spaces has mitigated in comparison with the pre-COVID-19 periods; which is in line with previous studies.

Indexed as

Built environmentCOVID-19 (coronavirus)PandemicSocial interactionsSocietal mobilityUrban space

Identifiers

PMID36540772
PMCPMC9756814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.