Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36540762›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2022

Disparities in patient portal access by US adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Akira Nishii, Celeste Campos-Castillo, Denise Anthony

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06598436 (Achieving Chronic Care equiTy by leVeraging the Telehealth Ecosystem), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06598436 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Achieving Chronic Care equiTy by leVeraging the Telehealth Ecosystem

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2024 to 2028Enrolled600ConditionsDiabetesArmsDigital Health Coaching (Patient-Level Intervention), Practice Facilitation (Clinic-Level Intervention)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Accessing Patient Portals: Some Patients Want a Helping Hand.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Journal of health communication · 2026
    Article
  9. More Older Adults Try Patient Portals in Recent Years, but Many Don't Continue: A Meta-Analysis.Extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Akira NishiiDepartment of Health Management & Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Celeste Campos-CastilloDepartment of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7376-1842
Denise AnthonyDepartment of Health Management & Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5815-9055
University of Michigan · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Online patient portals become important during disruptions to in-person health care, like when cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other respiratory viruses rise, yet underlying structural inequalities associated with race, socio-economic status, and other socio-demographic characteristics may affect their use. We analyzed a population-based survey to identify disparities within the United States in access to online portals during the early period of COVID-19 in 2020. Materials and Methods: The National Cancer Institute fielded the 2020 Health and Information National Trends Survey from February to June 2020. We conducted multivariable analysis to identify socio-demographic characteristics of US patients who were offered and accessed online portals, and reasons for nonuse. Results: Less than half of insured adult patients reported accessing an online portal in the prior 12 months, and this was less common among patients who are male, are Hispanic, have less than a college degree, have Medicaid insurance, have no regular provider, or have no internet. Reasons for nonuse include: wanting to speak directly to a provider, not having an online record, concerns about privacy, and discomfort with technology. Discussion: Despite the rapid expansion of digital health technologies due to COVID-19, we found persistent socio-demographic disparities in access to patient portals. Ensuring that digital health tools are secure, private, and trustworthy would address some patient concerns that are barriers to portal access. Conclusion: Expanding the use of online portals requires explicitly addressing fundamental inequities to prevent exacerbating existing disparities, particularly during surges in cases of COVID-19 and other respiratory viruses that tax health care resources.

Indexed as

COVID-19disparitieshealth information technologypatient portalstelehealth

Identifiers

PMID36540762
PMCPMC9757864
OpenAlexW4311261144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.