ArticlePersonality and individual differences2021
"What's next?" Individual differences in expected repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Personality and individual differences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of aging and emotions on time processing.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023Article
- With or without the Mask: Age Differences in Perceived Trustworthiness and Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Time to Get Vaccinated? The Role of Time Perspective, Consideration of Future Consequences, Conspiracy Beliefs, Religious Faith, Gender, and Race on Intention to Vaccinate for COVID-19 in the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Aging and Mixed Emotions: A Word-Suffix Approach in Free Recall.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Exploring vaccine hesitancy: the twofold role of critical thinking.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Review
- Adjustment Processes After the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Grounded Theory Study Based on Clinical Psychologists' Experience.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- The Fear of Contagion and the Attitude Toward the Restrictive Measures Imposed to Face COVID-19 in Italy: The Psychological Consequences Caused by the Pandemic One Year After It Began.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health, Quality of Life and Intrafamilial Relations - A Population-Based Survey in Germany.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Improving University Students' Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From an Online Counseling Intervention in Italy.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Survey data on the consequences of COVID-19 and home confinement on the educational community and families in Spain.Data in brief · 2021Article
- Factors Related to Women's Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from a Two-Wave Longitudinal Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Updating the Chieti Affective Action Videos database with older adults.Scientific data · 2021Article
- The Psychological Impact of Coronavirus Pandemic Restrictions in Italy. The Mediating Role of the Fear of COVID-19 in the Relationship between Positive and Negative Affect with Positive and Negative Outcomes.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2021Article
- Data on the effects of COVID-19 pandemic on people's expectations about their future.Data in brief · 2021Article
- Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health of Chinese Residents in Its Initial Stage.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the future are hardly predictable, and people differ in terms of expected repercussions on their future. This study investigated individual differences in the pandemic's expected repercussions, with particular attention to a Balanced Time Perspective (BTP). BTP reflects an individual profile with optimal temporal orientations, it is positively associated with mental health, and it has proven to promote successful coping with unexpected crises. We analyzed data from 3991 adults from 18 to 85 years old participating in an online survey conducted during the Italian lockdown. Participants provided information on BTP, affective states, financial resources, and expectations for the future. Multi-group path analysis was used to test the hypothesized model and to explore gender differences. Results showed that people with a more BTP had fewer negative beliefs about COVID-19's consequences on their future life. BTP affected expected repercussions also indirectly, via affects and beliefs. Finally, gender emerged as a significant moderator of some of the relationships highlighted. The present study contributes to the understanding of the psychological reactions to the current health emergency by confirming its impact on several life domains besides health, not only in the present but also in the anticipated future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.