Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36540676›Full record

ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2022

Feasibility study of mobile phone photography as a possible outcome measure of systemic sclerosis-related digital lesions.

Adrian K Davison, Graham Dinsdale, Paul New, Joanne Manning, Helen Patrick, Vicky P Taxiarchi, William G Dixon, Andy Vail, Andrea K Murray, Mark Dickinson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Adrian K DavisonDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6496-0209
Graham DinsdaleDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Paul NewDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Joanne ManningDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Helen PatrickDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Vicky P TaxiarchiCentre for Biostatistics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
William G DixonDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5881-4857
Andy VailCentre for Biostatistics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Andrea K MurrayDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9244-2882
Mark DickinsonPhoton Science Institute, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Christopher TaylorDivision of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ariane L HerrickDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4941-7926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Clinical trials assessing systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related digital ulcers have been hampered by a lack of reliable outcome measures of healing. Our objective was to assess the feasibility of patients collecting high-quality mobile phone images of their digital lesions as a first step in developing a smartphone-based outcome measure. Methods: Patients with SSc-related digital (finger) lesions photographed one or more lesions each day for 30 days using their smartphone and uploaded the images to a secure Dropbox folder. Image quality was assessed using six criteria: blurriness, shadow, uniformity of lighting, dot location, dot angle and central positioning of the lesion. Patients completed a feedback questionnaire. Results: Twelve patients returned 332 photographs of 18 lesions. Each patient sent a median of 29.5 photographs [interquartile range (IQR) 15-33.5], with a median of 15 photographs per lesion (IQR 6-32). Twenty-two photographs were duplicates. Of the remaining 310 images, 256 (77%) were sufficiently in focus; 268 (81%) had some shadow; lighting was even in 56 (17%); dot location was acceptable in 233 (70%); dot angle was ideal in 107 (32%); and the lesion was centred in 255 (77%). Patient feedback suggested that 6 of 10 would be willing to record images daily in future studies, and 9 of 10 at least one to three times per week. Conclusion: Taking smartphone photographs of digital lesions was feasible for most patients, with most lesions in focus and central in the image. These promising results will inform the next research phase (to develop a smartphone monitoring application incorporating photographs and symptom tracking).

Indexed as

digital ulcersimagingsmartphone photographySSc

Identifiers

PMID36540676
PMCPMC9757677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.