ArticleJournal of pain research2022
Trends in Congenital Insensitivity to Pain with Anhidrosis: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2000 to 2021.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Living without pain: A 10-year study of congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Recurrent Osteomyelitis in a Paediatric Patient with a NovelChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Successful Management of a Complicated Forearm Fracture in a Patient with Congenital Insensitivity to Pain: A Case Report.International medical case reports journal · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review of Congenital Insensitivity to Pain, a Rare Disease.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis (CIPA) is a very rare inherited autosomal recessive disease that has multiple clinical manifestations. Since its symptoms are related to different systems, this disorder has been investigated on a variety of topics. To better understand publications about CIPA, we conducted a bibliometric study to evaluate research publications on CIPA from 2000 to 2021, and delineate the key contributions in terms of countries, authors and sources. Methods: Quantitative analysis of publications on CIPA from 2000 to 2021 was interpreted and graphed through the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) of Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection. The bibliometric package in R 4.1.1, VOSviewer 1.6.18, and GraphPad Prism 8.4 were used to conduct the bibliometric analysis. Results: From 2000 to 2021, a total of 163 publications were retrieved. China had the largest number of publications (n = 31), while Japan had the highest number of citations (621 citations). Levy J and Indo Y were perhaps the most impactful researchers in the field of CIPA. The co-authorship of authors and institutions indicated little cooperation on CIPA research between different countries. Conclusion: Based on the bibliometric analysis, we have a comprehensive view of the global status of CIPA research, and the results indicate that CIPA needs more attention and cooperation to facilitate the study of its pathological mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.