Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36540535›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Cryopreservation: A Review Article.

Anurag N Jaiswal, Anjali Vagga

RetractedAbstract readReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Plant Tissue Culture: A Short-Term Conservation Tool.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anurag N JaiswalMedical Education, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND.
Anjali VaggaBiochemistry, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organelles, cells, tissues, or any other biological construction can be preserved using a method called cryopreservation, in which samples are cooled to extremely low temperatures. The reaction of the living cell to the formation of ice is both theoretically intriguing and practically useful. Since osmotic shock, membrane damage, and ice crystal formation during freezing and thawing will result in cell death, other viable tissues and stem cells, which are of much importance for uses in basic research and medical applications, may not be preserved by simple cooling or freezing for large periods. With the aid of cryoprotective agents (CPAs) and temperature control technology, the successful cryopreservation of cells and tissues have been rising in recent time. Sometimes excessive use of cryoprotective agents may damage the original structure of preserved tissue. Therefore, cryoprotective agents should be used appropriately, and their quantities should be regulated. Excessive cooling may damage the membrane structure of the cell, so cooling should be done appropriately. Slow freezing and vitrification method are the two procedures that may be used for cryopreservation. Vitrification's main benefit is that it significantly reduces the likelihood of freeze damage, making it possible to maintain a high enough cell survival rate. Good manipulation skills are also required, and there is a considerable risk of infection with pathogenic pathogens. [As1] Fruitful cryopreservation of cells or tissues and their therapeutic use will require ongoing knowledge of the physical and chemical features which take place in the freezing and thawing cycle. We briefly discuss representative cryopreservation techniques and their clinical uses in this study.

Indexed as

advancesclinical applicationscpascryoinjuriescryopreservation

Identifiers

PMID36540535
PMCPMC9756256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.