Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36540534›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

The Effect of a Pre-consultation Tablet-Based Questionnaire on Changes in Consultation Time for First-Visit Patients With Diabetes: A Single-Case Design Preliminary Study.

Ai Nishida, Osamu Ogawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ai NishidaDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, JPN.
Osamu OgawaDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective It has been reported that physicians spend about 50% of their time in the outpatient department doing non-face-to-face patient work, such as charting and desk activities. Work outside of patient consultations is often considered a burden. In this study, we aimed to examine whether the use of pre-consultation tablet-based questionnaires for first-visit diabetic patients had any impact on the time spent for consultation. Methods The sole participant was a diabetologist with more than 20 years of experience. The time spent in the clinic was compared via a single-case experimental design (ABAB) using paper- and tablet-based questionnaires for a total of 20 first-visit diabetic patients. Results The median pre-clinical time without patients was significantly shorter in the tablet group than in the paper group (two minutes and 45 seconds vs. five minutes and 39 seconds; p=0.003). The median clinical time with patients in the tablet group was significantly longer than that in the paper group (19 minutes and 37 seconds vs. 11 minutes and 25 seconds; p=0.026). The total clinical time was not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.25). Conclusions Our results suggest that tablet-based pre-consultation questionnaires may have an impact on the allocation of time for medical examinations and improve the quality of diabetes care.

Indexed as

consultation timediabetesfirst-visit patientpre-consultation questionnairestablet-based questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID36540534
PMCPMC9759614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.