ReviewCureus2022
Prevalence of Congenital Heart Defects in Individuals With Down Syndrome in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral Health and Dental Management of Children With Down Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Article
- Congenital Heart Defect Screening Among Children with Down Syndrome in Rwanda: A Cross-Sectional Study.Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Public Awareness and Perceptions of Congenital Disabilities in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Impact of Resistance Training on Body Composition and Physical Function in Individuals with Down Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Critical issue in the identification of Down syndrome and its problems in Central Java, Indonesia: The fact of needing health care and better management.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2024Article
- Cardiac Complications in Trisomy 21 Patients in a Secondary Hospital: A Descriptive Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Walking capacity and its association with quality of life among children with down syndrome in Saudi Arabia.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with Down syndrome (DS) are commonly diagnosed with congenital heart disease (CHD), which is the leading cause of mortality in this group during the first two years of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to review the current publications to assess the pooled prevalence of overall CHDs in individuals with DS in KSA. We conducted the search on the databases PubMed, EBSCO, Scopus, Web of Science through Clarivate, and Google Scholar using Boolean operators and various keywords. The Rayyan - Intelligent Systematic Reviews website (https://www.rayyan.ai/) was used for citation management and MedCalc® Statistical Software version 20.115 was used for the quantitative data synthesis (MedCalc Software Ltd., 2022, Ostend Belgium). We initially retrieved a total of 402 citations from the primary search and 10 articles were finally included after title screening and full-text assessment. A total of 1590 subjects were enrolled in the pooled analyses. The pooled prevalence of CHDs was found to be 66.1% (95% CI: 57.2% to 74.5%). There was significant heterogeneity (I2 = 92.2%), and inspection of the funnel plot shows the symmetrical distribution of plotted data. According to our study, 66% of DS patients in Saudi Arabia had one or more congenital cardiac defects. Due to the significant inter-study heterogeneity, the reliability of our results is, nevertheless, limited. We advise conducting more research to provide better data for determining the prevalence of CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.