Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36540502›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Ascorbic Acid for Prevention of Intraoperative Blood Loss and Related Complications During Myomectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Ahmed Abu-Zaid, Hanaa Alrashidi, Arwa Almouh, Zainab M Abualsaud, Ahmed M Saleh, Sultan B Aldawsari, Mohannad M Alajmi, Osama Alomar

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Ahmed Abu-ZaidCollege of Graduate Health Sciences, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA.
Hanaa AlrashidiDepartment of Internship, Kuwait Institute for Medical Specializations, Kuwait City, KWT.
Arwa AlmouhCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal Univeristy, Riyadh, SAU.
Zainab M AbualsaudCollege of Medicine, Almaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.
Ahmed M SalehCollege of Medicine and Medical Science, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, BHR.
Sultan B AldawsariCollege of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, JOR.
Mohannad M AlajmiCollege of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, JOR.
Osama AlomarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, SAU.
University of Jordan · JOAlfaisal University · SAArabian Gulf University · BHCentral Asian University · UZKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAKuwait Institute for Medical Specialization · KWUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leiomyomas are inherently well-vascularized neoplasms; thus, they are very vulnerable to bleeding-associated complications during myomectomy. Ascorbic acid has well-established functions in tissue healing and the prevention of bleeding tendencies. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have explored the antihemorrhagic utility of ascorbic acid administration during myomectomy. This research aimed to systematically and meta-analytically summarize the clinical antihemorrhagic efficacy of ascorbic acid (i.e., the intervention arm) versus placebo/no treatment (i.e., the control arm) during myomectomy. We electronically searched six sources, i.e., PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar. Our search was from inception until October 2022. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Scale (version 2) to assess the quality of the included studies. We summarized the effect sizes as the mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) in a fixed-effects or random-effects model. Overall, three RCTs met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 193 patients: 99 patients were allocated to the ascorbic acid arm, whereas 94 patients were allocated to the control arm. The overall study quality was "low" and "some concerns" risk of bias in two and one RCT(s), respectively. There was no significant difference between the ascorbic acid and control arms regarding the mean intraoperative blood loss (n=2 RCTs, MD = -190.29 ml, 95% CI [-626.62, 246.05], p=0.39) and mean change in hemoglobin level (n=3 RCTs, MD = -0.26 mg/dl, 95% CI [-0.56, 0.04], p=0.09), respectively. Conversely, the ascorbic acid arm had statistically significant reductions in the mean operative time (n=3 RCTs, MD = -24.10 min, 95% CI [-30.67, -17.53], p<0.001) and the rate of blood transfusion (n=3 RCTs, RR=0.36, 95% CI [0.15, 0.87], p=0.02) compared with the control arm. No serious adverse events related to ascorbic acid were identified. In conclusion, ascorbic acid administration was associated with several beneficial effects, including reductions in mean operative time and rate of blood transfusion, but without affecting the mean intraoperative blood loss and mean change in hemoglobin level. In view of the limitations of the present meta-analysis, the use of ascorbic acid as an antihemorrhagic additive among patients undergoing myomectomy is not strongly recommended.

Indexed as

ascorbic acidhemorrhagemeta-analysismyomectomysystematic reviewvitamin c

Identifiers

PMID36540502
PMCPMC9756975
OpenAlexW4309351750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.