Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36540440›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Gastrointestinal Microbiota and Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Interactions: A Systematic Review.

Denise Csendes, Sai Dheeraj Gutlapalli, Keerthana Prakash, Kiran Maee Swarnakari, Meena Bai, Mohana Priya Manoharan, Rabab Raja, Aneeque Jamil, Aditya Desai, Darshi M Desai and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. ISME communications · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Denise CsendesInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Sai Dheeraj GutlapalliInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Keerthana PrakashInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Kiran Maee SwarnakariInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Meena BaiMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Mohana Priya ManoharanInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Rabab RajaMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Aneeque JamilInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Aditya DesaiInternal Medicine Clinical Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Darshi M DesaiInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Safeera KhanInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women besides basal cell and squamous cell skin cancer. The current systemic therapy guidelines for this heterogeneous disease are mainly based on the molecular subtypes. However, more research is required to improve rates of therapy resistance and prevent side effects. Previous studies have shown that the human gut microbiota may have an important role in carcinogenesis as well as therapy outcomes, but this factor has not yet been integrated into therapy protocols. This systematic review aims to analyze how response rates and side effect profiles of breast cancer systemic therapies may be affected by the gastrointestinal microbiota. A literature search was performed using multiple databases and keywords related to gastrointestinal microbiota, breast cancer, and anticancer drugs. Studies were excluded if they primarily focused on diseases other than breast cancer. Abstracts, reviews, meta-analyses, and animal experiments were also excluded. After screening, nine studies met all selection criteria and included a total of 566 participants. Most studies described the impact of the gut microbiota on therapy response, but a few additionally discussed chemotherapy side effects, probiotics, or antibiotics. In general, diversity and specific microbiota were linked to chemotherapy response as well as prognosis. Microbiota diversity was also predictive of side effects such as neurological symptoms, weight gain, and constipation. The diversity and composition of gastrointestinal microbiota may serve as biomarkers and provide pathways for the optimization of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

breast cancerchemotherapygastrointestinal microbiotamicrobiota diversityprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID36540440
PMCPMC9760128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.