Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36540349›Full record

ReviewDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2022

Gender Differences in Prevalence and Clinical Correlates of Lipohypertrophy in Insulin-Exposed Patients with Diabetes Mellitus.

Siping Peng, Mingming Xu, Hengxia Zhao, Haiyan Yang, Linlin Zhang, Shuqiao Hu, Huiling Liu, Yuqin She, Maosheng Lee, Huilin Li

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Siping PengThe Fourth Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Mingming XuDepartment of Endocrinology, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Hengxia ZhaoThe Fourth Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Haiyan YangDepartment of Endocrinology, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Linlin ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Shuqiao HuDepartment of Endocrinology, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Huiling LiuDepartment of Endocrinology, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Yuqin SheDepartment of Endocrinology, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Maosheng Lee *The Fourth Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-7354-447X
Huilin Li *The Fourth Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Shenzhen Pingle Orthopedic Hospital · CNGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess potential gender differences in prevalence and clinical relevance of insulin-related lipohypertrophy (LH). Patients and Methods: Five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP) were systematically searched for studies, from inception to 1st Sep 2022, on the prevalence of insulin-related LH. The eligibility of articles was independently screened, and the included studies were evaluated using standardized quality assessment tools. Results: A total of 22 studies mentioned the LH prevalence in different genders, of which two are about gestational diabetes; therefore, 20 studies were eventually included, providing data on 6238 patients. The prevalence of LH varied from 30.26% to 72.54%. Ten studies (4392 patients) were conducted with the adult diabetes patients of different genders over the age of 18, the total prevalence rate of LH was 51.73%, the LH prevalence in male gender was from 41.94% to 68.57% and the rate of the total population was 54.89% (2046 patients); The LH prevalence in female gender was from 33.18% to 70% and the rate of the total population was 48.98% (2346 patients), and the prevalence of LH was significantly different between male and female gender ( Conclusion: The evidence shows that the results of gender differences in the LH prevalence are inconsistent with different types of DM. Probably, there is no gender differences in the LH prevalence in adult patients with T1DM, but it has a gender difference between male and female in T2DM. More strictly designed clinical studies are needed to further verify and reveal the underlying mechanisms.

Indexed as

diabetes mellitusgender differenceshypertrophyinsulin injectionlipohypertrophyprevalence

Identifiers

PMID36540349
PMCPMC9760066
OpenAlexW4311306057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.