Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36540199›Full record

ArticleEvolution2022

Popular media and the bombardment of evolution misconceptions.

Daniel G Ferguson, Jessica Abele, Sarah Palmer, Jordan Willis, Connor McDonald, Chandler Messer, Juliana Lindberg, T Heath Ogden, Elizabeth G Bailey, Jamie L Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel G FergusonDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, 4102 LSB, Provo, UT 84602 USA.
Jessica AbeleDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, 4102 LSB, Provo, UT 84602 USA.
Sarah PalmerDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, 4102 LSB, Provo, UT 84602 USA.
Jordan WillisDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, 4102 LSB, Provo, UT 84602 USA.
Connor McDonaldDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, 4102 LSB, Provo, UT 84602 USA.
Chandler MesserDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, 4102 LSB, Provo, UT 84602 USA.
Juliana LindbergDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, 4102 LSB, Provo, UT 84602 USA.
T Heath OgdenDepartment of Biology, Utah Valley University, Orem, UT 84058 USA.
Elizabeth G BaileyDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, 4102 LSB, Provo, UT 84602 USA.
Jamie L JensenDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, 4102 LSB, Provo, UT 84602 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many students enter science classrooms with misconceptions about scientific principles. One of the most perceived controversial scientific principle for students is evolution. Students struggle to learn and accept evolution due to the many misconceptions students have interacted with before they enter a biology class. Evolution misconceptions come from many sources, such as religious beliefs, textbooks, and even unprepared educators. However, with students spending on average over seven hours a day viewing popular media, it is crucial to investigate further the accuracy of the portrayals of evolution in popular media. Results: We gathered data on the sources students saw evolution portrayed in popular media and determined what misconceptions were present in these popular media references. We found that 96% of the popular media references mentioned by students in our study inaccurately depicted evolution. The two most common misconceptions we observed in popular media were that evolution was depicted as a linear process and that individual organisms evolve instead of populations. Conclusion: Popular media does a poor job depicting evolution, which may be why many students are hesitant to learn evolution and overcome misconceptions. We suggest that these incorrect portrayals of evolution may provide an engaging way to teach correct evolutionary principles in the classroom.

Indexed as

BiologyEvolution educationMemesPopular culturePreconceptionsSocial media

Identifiers

PMID36540199
PMCPMC9756704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.