ReviewAnnals of nuclear cardiology2022
Post-ISCHEMIA Trial Era: Reconsideration of the Role of Nuclear Cardiology in Patients with Chronic Coronary Artery Disease.
Review in Annals of nuclear cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial has had a great impact on the management of chronic coronary artery disease (CAD). One of the implications of this trial is the importance of close patient follow-up. To improve patient prognosis, evaluation of the residual extent of ischemia after treatment may be important because several studies have shown a close relationship between residual ischemia and cardiac events. For this assessment, myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS) has been utilized and is almost the only modality. Among the participants in the ISCHEMIA trial, more than 10% were excluded due to the absence of obstructive CAD. The pathophysiology of ischemia without non-obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) is gaining recognition; however, diagnosis is difficult, except for the assessment of myocardial flow reserve (MFR). Myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography (PET) is the most common modality for noninvasive evaluation of MFR; however, its availability in Japan is limited. For a breakthrough in this situation, a novel gamma camera with a cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) semiconductor might be one of the solutions that enables the evaluation of MFR with a commercially available perfusion tracer, similar to PET. Another solution is a novel PET tracer with a longer half-life. Clinical trials with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.